Car Acceleration & Friction: Force, Coefficient & Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration, friction force, and coefficient of friction for a 1300 kg car traveling around a circular road with a radius of 40 m in 35 seconds. The user calculated an acceleration of 1.289 m/s² and a friction force of 1675.819 N, while the reference site provided higher values of 1.47 m/s² and 2210 N. The user suspects the site used an incorrect formula for acceleration, leading to discrepancies in their results. They calculated a coefficient of friction of 0.132, which aligns with their acceleration but not with the site's friction force value. The user concludes that the reference site likely contains errors, particularly given its authorship by high school students.
intdx
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/index.html
4. A 1300 kg car takes 35 s to travel around a circular road that has a radius of 40 m.
...
b. What is the acceleration of the car?
c. How big should the force of friction be to maintain this acceleration?
d. How big should the coefficient of the force of friction be?
m=1300kg
t=35s
r=40m

Homework Equations


V=\frac{2\pi r}{t}
a_c=\frac{V^2}{r}
F_c=ma_c
F_f=\mu mg
F_f=F_c
\mu=\frac{a_c}{g}=\frac{F_c}{mg}

The Attempt at a Solution


Plugging into the formulae is pretty elementary, so I'll spare you all that. I used the first two equations for part b, then the third for part c. Anyway, I get 1.289m/s2 for part b and 1675.819N for part c, but the site's answers are 1.47m/s2 and 2210N, respectively. It appears that, to have arrived at their answer for part b, they used the incorrect equation a_c=V^2/t. I'm not sure how they arrived at the answer for part c.

Using either part of the last equation above (with my answers for part b or part c) gives me μ=0.132. The site's answer for part d is 0.15, but--using the same equation that I have listed above--this is consistent with its answer for part b, but not with its answer for part c.

Would someone please explain what's going on here? :confused:

Thanks!

P.S. You know, I feel as if, from typing this, I've pretty much assured myself that the site is wrong. (I have another fairly recent post in which I consider the same thing, and the couple of replies it's gotten seem to support the idea.) I hope that doesn't sound arrogant, but it bothers me that the site was written by high school students.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I agree with the numbers you got. I think that the site is wrong.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top