Carbon sequestration, how does it work? Is it practical?

AI Thread Summary
Carbon sequestration involves capturing and storing carbon dioxide to mitigate climate change. The process primarily occurs through natural mechanisms, such as trees absorbing carbon from the atmosphere and storing it in their biomass. The discussion raises questions about the methods of carbon sequestration, including the specific processes and mechanisms involved, as well as the energy requirements of these methods. On an industrial scale, the feasibility of capturing carbon emissions from various sources, such as vehicles and power plants, is explored. The conversation emphasizes the importance of individual research before seeking answers in forums, suggesting that many questions about carbon sequestration can be addressed through basic online searches. This highlights a broader expectation for participants to engage actively in the learning process rather than relying solely on community responses.
clurt
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Carbon sequestration to mitigate the impact of carbon emissions into the earths atmosphere
Hi All,

I understand carbon sequestration in the simplest sense is capturing and storing carbon.

As seen in the title, I'm going to split this into two sections.

i) How does it work?

I imagine that trees, in a sense are doing this. They take in the carbon from our atmosphere and is stored in their biomass.

For us, how is carbon sequestration carried out?
- What is the process?
- What is the mechanism, with an example?
- How much energy does the process use? Is it thirsty?

ii) Can this be carried out on the industrial level.

Serious question, can we capture carbon being emitted by trains, buses, ships and other machines?
Can we capture the carbon being produced at coal and gas plants?
Not sure what can and cannot be shared regarding climate change, but below is a good start ;)
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=carbon+sequestration
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Have you done ANY research on this or were you hoping we'd do it for you?
 
Wikipedia's article seems to do a decent job.
 
hmmm27 said:
Wikipedia's article seems to do a decent job.
As he would have found out had he made even a trivial effort.

@clurt my point here is that even with only 28 posts, I would expect that you would know by now that this is not a Q&A forum where you just ask a question and somebody gives you an answer. There are plenty of those around, but this isn't one of them; here folks are expected to make at least some effort on their own before asking others.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, Bystander, hmmm27 and 1 other person
I'm curious if he/she has found an issue that isn't reasonably addressed by a cursory search, online.
 
hmmm27 said:
I'm curious if he/she has found an issue that isn't reasonably addressed by a cursory search, online.

If he did, wouldn't it be better to ask that question?
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara
We have little shade but plenty of wind on my property. The upshot of this is that I have to be judicious in how/where I put up shade-creating barriers in various places around my property to maximise shade without unduly large windage. My property is an irregular polygon and not aligned with the cardinal axes, so it is not easy to tell where the shade will be at a given time. For example, I have put up an umbrella next to our pool, but it can only shade the southish-side of the pool, and...
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
Back
Top