Carnot function -- How can I prove f(t2,t1)=f(t2−t1,0)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter filip97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carnot Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the function relating the quotient of heats in thermodynamics, specifically examining the relationship ##f(t_2,t_1)=f(t_2-t_1,0)##, where ##t_1## and ##t_2## are empirical temperatures. Participants explore the theoretical implications of this function and its derivation, referencing concepts from thermodynamics and temperature scales.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests proving the relationship using Taylor series but reports difficulty in doing so.
  • Another participant advises exploring thermodynamic principles involving heat to approach the problem differently.
  • A participant expresses that their reasoning is based on intuitive understanding of empirical temperature scales, emphasizing the variable nature of temperature.
  • Further elaboration includes a reference to a textbook by Enrico Fermi, which presents the function as a ratio of monotone increasing functions of temperature.
  • Discussion includes the idea that if two objective temperature scales are homomorphic, they must be linear, leading to a formulation of the relationship in terms of Cauchy's equation.
  • One participant mentions the derivation of thermodynamics through the analysis of thermodynamic cycles and references the second law of thermodynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the approach to proving the relationship and the underlying principles. There is no consensus on the method or the implications of the function, indicating multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various textbooks and concepts from thermodynamics, indicating a reliance on established literature while also expressing personal interpretations and intuitive reasoning. The discussion highlights the complexity of the topic and the need for clarity in definitions and assumptions.

filip97
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If we have that quotient of heats ##Q_2/Q_1=f(t_2,t_1)##, where ##t_1,t_2## are emirical temperatures. Is this function satisfies :

##f(t_2,t_1)=f(t_2-t_1,0)##

I try prove it with Taylor series of two variables, but i can't prove anything.
 
Science news on Phys.org
So you will have to try something else. Something thermodynamic involving ##Q##.
 
How ?
 
Check your notes and/or textbook. It is your exercise.
 
No, this is my intuitive thinking about empirical temperature scales because temperature is variable of interval type(levels of measurement).
 
filip97 said:
intuitive thinking
What is the context of your exercise? A curriculum on intuition, or something in termodynamics ?
 
I was reading Thermodynamics by Enrico Fermi first they give this function ##\frac{Q_2}{Q_1}=f(t_2,t_1)=\frac{g(t_2)}{g(t_1)}##, where ##g## is monotone increasing function. Idea is if we have scales of temperature ##r,s## (monotone increasing), but and their inverses is also scales of empirical temperatures ##r^{-1},s^{-1}##. ##f(t_2,t_1)=f(s(t_2),s(t_1))##, because function ##f##, doesn't depend of scales, and depend only of temperatures (Carnot's theorem). If we has two objective temperature scales they must has homomorphism between scales, and they must be linear, because temperature is interval data e.g.

##s(t)=\alpha x+\beta, \alpha>0, \beta## is some parameter. I must pack properties that homomorphism is linear function between ##s## and ##r##. Let it be ##s(t_2-t_1)=s(t_2)-s(t_1)##

We have ##f(t_2,t_1)=f(t_2-t_1,0)=f(s(t_2-t_1),s(0))=f(s(t_2-t_1)-s(0),0)=f(s(t_2),s(t_1))=f(s(t_2)-s(t_1),0)\implies
s(t_2-t_1)-s(0)=s(t_2)-s(t_1)##, set ##t_2=t_1##, this is Caushy equation and this solution is ##s(t)=ct##. As I says
scale is and function ##F(t)=r(s^{-1}(t)),r(t_2-t_1)=r(t_2)-r(t_1), s(t_1)=x, s(t_2)=y\implies F(x-y)=F(x)-F(y) \implies F(x)=\alpha x+\beta##(Pfanzagl, Theory of Measurement, page 98)
 
Usually this calculation occurs in textbooks, where thermodynamics is inductively derived by analyzing thermodynamic cycles. Here one uses the 2nd Law of thermodynamics in the formulation that there cannot be a perpetuum mobile of the 2nd kind (Clausius, Planck).

A masterpiece is the textbook

R. Becker, Theory of Heat, Springer Verlag (1967)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K