Carnot function -- How can I prove f(t2,t1)=f(t2−t1,0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter filip97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carnot Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the quotient of heats, represented as ##f(t_2,t_1) = f(t_2 - t_1, 0)##, using thermodynamic principles. The participants reference the work of Enrico Fermi and the properties of monotone increasing functions in temperature scales. The proof involves demonstrating that the function ##f## is independent of the temperature scales and relies on the linearity of homomorphisms between different temperature scales. Key texts mentioned include "Theory of Measurement" by Pfanzagl and "Theory of Heat" by R. Becker.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of empirical temperature scales and their properties
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic principles, particularly Carnot's theorem
  • Knowledge of Cauchy's functional equation and its implications
  • Experience with Taylor series expansions in multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Carnot's theorem in thermodynamics
  • Explore Cauchy's functional equation and its solutions in mathematical analysis
  • Review the concept of monotone increasing functions in the context of temperature scales
  • Examine the second law of thermodynamics and its applications in heat transfer
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mathematicians interested in functional equations, and researchers exploring the foundations of temperature measurement and its implications in physical sciences.

filip97
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
If we have that quotient of heats ##Q_2/Q_1=f(t_2,t_1)##, where ##t_1,t_2## are emirical temperatures. Is this function satisfies :

##f(t_2,t_1)=f(t_2-t_1,0)##

I try prove it with Taylor series of two variables, but i can't prove anything.
 
Science news on Phys.org
So you will have to try something else. Something thermodynamic involving ##Q##.
 
How ?
 
Check your notes and/or textbook. It is your exercise.
 
No, this is my intuitive thinking about empirical temperature scales because temperature is variable of interval type(levels of measurement).
 
filip97 said:
intuitive thinking
What is the context of your exercise? A curriculum on intuition, or something in termodynamics ?
 
I was reading Thermodynamics by Enrico Fermi first they give this function ##\frac{Q_2}{Q_1}=f(t_2,t_1)=\frac{g(t_2)}{g(t_1)}##, where ##g## is monotone increasing function. Idea is if we have scales of temperature ##r,s## (monotone increasing), but and their inverses is also scales of empirical temperatures ##r^{-1},s^{-1}##. ##f(t_2,t_1)=f(s(t_2),s(t_1))##, because function ##f##, doesn't depend of scales, and depend only of temperatures (Carnot's theorem). If we has two objective temperature scales they must has homomorphism between scales, and they must be linear, because temperature is interval data e.g.

##s(t)=\alpha x+\beta, \alpha>0, \beta## is some parameter. I must pack properties that homomorphism is linear function between ##s## and ##r##. Let it be ##s(t_2-t_1)=s(t_2)-s(t_1)##

We have ##f(t_2,t_1)=f(t_2-t_1,0)=f(s(t_2-t_1),s(0))=f(s(t_2-t_1)-s(0),0)=f(s(t_2),s(t_1))=f(s(t_2)-s(t_1),0)\implies
s(t_2-t_1)-s(0)=s(t_2)-s(t_1)##, set ##t_2=t_1##, this is Caushy equation and this solution is ##s(t)=ct##. As I says
scale is and function ##F(t)=r(s^{-1}(t)),r(t_2-t_1)=r(t_2)-r(t_1), s(t_1)=x, s(t_2)=y\implies F(x-y)=F(x)-F(y) \implies F(x)=\alpha x+\beta##(Pfanzagl, Theory of Measurement, page 98)
 
Usually this calculation occurs in textbooks, where thermodynamics is inductively derived by analyzing thermodynamic cycles. Here one uses the 2nd Law of thermodynamics in the formulation that there cannot be a perpetuum mobile of the 2nd kind (Clausius, Planck).

A masterpiece is the textbook

R. Becker, Theory of Heat, Springer Verlag (1967)
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM and BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K