Cart Explosion- Is Energy conserved?

AI Thread Summary
In a cart explosion scenario, kinetic energy is not conserved due to energy losses from factors like friction and deformation, despite the initial potential energy stored in the springs. While the total mechanical energy is conserved, the transformation of elastic potential energy into kinetic energy is not perfectly efficient. The discussion highlights the distinction between conservation of energy and conservation of kinetic energy, emphasizing that some energy is inevitably lost during the process. The initial potential energy of the springs contributes to the kinetic energy of the carts, but not all of it translates effectively. Overall, while energy is conserved in a broader sense, kinetic energy specifically is not conserved in these experiments.
Dynamite
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
So yes that's the question:

In a cart explosions (where 2 carts with springs on the back are pushed together and let go) is the kinetic energy conserved? If not why?

I can't find it in my textbook or on internet sites (things specifically related to cart explosions anyways)

But attempting to answer this, I think it's conserved.. we just have no way of knowing what the initial potential energyof the springs are... ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the question about conserving energy or about conserving kinetic energy?
There are changes in KE involved (zero when the carts are stopped).
No doubt there will be some little losses of energy in the spring, movements of the carts, etc. - how picky are we supposed to be?
 
its actually about the conservation of kinetic energy ...

so would it be conserved?

I mean there would be elastic potential energy right.. ?and that would transform into kinetic energy?!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top