Cartesian Co-ordinates and Polar Co-ordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cartesian Polar
AI Thread Summary
Cartesian coordinates represent points in a three-dimensional space using x, y, and z values, while polar coordinates describe points in a two-dimensional space using a radius (r) and an angle (θ). The conversion between these systems involves formulas where x = r cos(θ) and y = r sin(θ), with r calculated as the distance from the origin and θ as the angle from the positive x-axis. The discussion also touches on the distinction between two-dimensional polar coordinates and their three-dimensional counterparts, cylindrical and spherical coordinates. Clarifications on the terms nEW, nEN, and xERe relate to different types of numbers, such as rational and real. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the differences between coordinate systems.
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
Just to make sure I got this right.

Cartesian is the popular x,y,z.

Polar is the one with degrees, and has a circular shape.

Is that it?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Another question I kind of forgot about in High School. :(

When they say nEW, nEN, or xERe?

I know some mean rational, real, or what not.

Can anyone help?
 
The only problem with your first post is that "x,y,z" is three dimensional and polar coordinates are two dimensional.

In two dimensions, the point (x,y) in Cartesian coordinates is (r,θ) in polar coordinates. r is the straight line distance from (0,0) to (x,y) and θ is the angle the line from (0,0) to (x,y) makes with the positive x-axis.
x= r cos(θ) and y= r sin(&theta).
r= √(x2+ y2) and θ= arctan(y/x).

In three dimensions, one can use either "cylindrical coordinates" or "spherical coordinates" as an analog to polar coordinates.
 
Thanks, that helps now.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top