Cartesian Coordinates and Cross Product of Vectors for Magnetic Field Direction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Cartesian coordinates and the cross product of vectors to determine the direction of the magnetic field. It clarifies that in the right-hand rule, the positive z direction points out of the page, represented by the equation ##\hat {k} = \hat {\bf \imath } \times\hat {\bf \jmath}##. The corkscrew rule is mentioned to explain the direction of the cross product, indicating that the magnetic field direction can vary based on the position of the charge relative to the wires. Participants express confusion about the problem's clarity, particularly regarding the influence of the charge's proximity to different wires on the magnetic field direction. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in understanding vector directions in magnetic field calculations.
The black vegetable
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2017-2-10_15-9-0.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


upload_2017-2-10_15-10-26.png


the answer given is the same but without the negative sign, I don't understand because the crossproduct of unit vectors
upload_2017-2-10_15-13-41.png

when using a Cartesian coordinates of the directions given by the right-hand rule? Is the positive z direction pointing out of the page if X and Y are as follows
upload_2017-2-10_15-18-3.png

apologies if this is in the wrong section, thanks for any help in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. ##\hat {k} = \hat {\bf \imath } \times\hat {\bf \jmath}## , so z points towards you, out of the screen.

Corkscrew rule I call it. Turn ##\hat{\bf \imath }## over the smallest angle towards ##\hat {k}##. Corkscrew will go in the minus y direction : $$\hat \imath \times\hat k = -\hat \jmath $$
 
The problem doesn't specify which of the two wires the charge -q is a distance b from. Does the answer change if you pick the other wire to be a distance b from -q?
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Thank you both your answers, TSny I thought the same, closer to the top wire the combined magnetic field would be in the opposite direction . Maybe the question is just not very good
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top