Cauchy Reimann & Complex functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the Cauchy-Riemann equations to the complex function G(s) = 1/(s+1) in the context of Laplace Transforms. The user seeks clarification on how to derive the real and imaginary components, Gx and Gy, from the expression G(σ + jω) = 1/(σ + jω + 1). The process involves rationalizing the denominator by multiplying by the complex conjugate, leading to the simplification of the function into its real and imaginary parts. The final forms of Gx and Gy are derived from this rationalization, confirming the function's analyticity. The user expresses gratitude for the assistance in overcoming their confusion.
phiby
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
I am a mechanical engineer who hasn't done any mechanical engineering for close to 20 years & hence forgotten all Mechanical Engineering & all Engineering Mathematics.

I need to revise on some Engineering Math now - Calculus, Laplace Transforms etc. I have been doing it for a couple of days.

I am getting stuck in a discussion of Complex Variables & Complex functions in Laplace Transforms.

G(s) = 1/(s+1)

We are trying to check if this satisfies Cachy-Reimann & hence analytic.

This is how the analysis goes in the notes I am referring to

G(σ + jω) = 1/(σ + jω + 1) = Gx + jGy ---------- (1)

From this, the next line says
"where

Gx = (σ + 1)/ ( (σ + 1)2 + ω2)
Gy = (-ω)/( (σ + 1)2 + ω2)
"

I don't see how you get Gx & Gy from (1)

Can someone help?

If this is based on some other Math stuff which I need to study before getting here, do let me know.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have
\frac{1}{\sigma+ 1+ j\omega}
and, essentially, you want to "rationalize the denominator".

Multiply both numerator and denominator of that fraction by \sigma+ 1- j\omega, the "complex conjugate" of the denominator:
\frac{1}{\sigma+ 1+ j\omega}\frac{\sigma+ 1- j\omega}{\sigma+ 1- j\omega}
In the numerator, we will have, of course, \sigma+ 1- j\omega. In the denominator, we have a product of "sum and difference" which is the "difference of the squares"- (\sigma+ 1+ j\omega)(\sigma+ 1- j\omega)= (\sigma+ 1)^2- (j\omega)^2= (\sigma+ 1)^2+ \omega^2 since j^2= -1

That is, the fraction reduces to
\frac{\sigma+ 1- j\omega}{(\sigma+1)^2+ \omega^2}
Gx and Gy are the real and imaginary parts of that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You have
\frac{1}{\sigma+ 1+ j\omega}
and, essentially, you want to "rationalize the denominator".

Thank you very much. I was stuck on that for quite some time.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top