Center of gravity and Newton's 3 Law of Motion.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a project demonstrating a physics phenomenon related to Newton's Laws of Motion, specifically the center of gravity. The participant plans to use an empty can filled with water and then smashed ice to illustrate circular motion. There is confusion about how the third law, which states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, is demonstrated in this setup. The effectiveness of the demonstration in showcasing Newton's laws is questioned, particularly regarding the third law's application. Clarifying the connection between the demonstration and the laws of motion is essential for the project.
NeomiXD
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I have a project to do and I have to make a demonstration about a physics phenomenon. I'n planning on doing a demonstration that explains one or all of Newton's Laws of Motion. I've chosen to do it on the center of gravity, but I want to know if it's
related to Newton's 3 Laws of Motion or is it not?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
third law is "every action has an equal and opposite reaction"

so some demonstrations may work and some may not

whats in your mind?
 
Well in my demonstration, I'm planning on taking an empty can and filling it with 1/3 of water to make it rotate in a circular motion on its edge. After I'm going to fill it with smashed ice instead of water and do the same thing.
 
Ok, I am a bit confused ... how is 3rd law demonstrated in it?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Misunderstanding Work-energy theorem and center of mass properties
Replies
7
Views
2K
Converting gravity into pressure inside the very center of a planet
Replies
4
Views
1K
Newton's second law (My turtle named Newton being accelerated)
Replies
9
Views
2K
How many discs will slide off the board as it decelerates?
Replies
17
Views
1K
Equation that relates gravity and period
Replies
4
Views
967
Newton's 2nd Law: Why is Resistance Considered a Positive Force?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Unbalanced force to find altitude of airplane
Replies
4
Views
2K
Understanding Newton's 2nd Law of Motion
Replies
6
Views
1K
Kinematics, curvilinear motion (a couple of questions)
Replies
30
Views
2K
Can we find the frequency of a rod pendulum by just using F=ma?
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top