Finding the Center of Mass in a Divided Square

AI Thread Summary
To find the new center of mass of a divided square with a circle cut out, first consider the square divided into four equal parts. After removing the circle and the corner piece, the remaining shape is symmetrical about both the x and y axes, simplifying the calculation. The center of mass can be determined by focusing on the remaining areas and their symmetry. However, the presence of the cut-out corner complicates the process, necessitating a return to calculating x_bar and y_bar for accuracy. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of symmetry in solving for the center of mass despite the complexities introduced by the cut-out section.
cmrgator
Imagine a square with side length "a". Now, divide the square into 4 equal squares with side length "a/2". In the top righthand corner of the large square, a circle with radius "a/4" is cut out, which also removes the top corner piece. What is the new center of mass? (The origin is at the center of the large square). Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here is an easy way to think about it.

Cut the circle out of the remaining 3 quarters of the large square, now you have a symmetrical shape about both x and y axis. The center of mass is the center, so we can now ignore this part.

Now what is the center of mass of the 3 circles?
 
Sorry, I don't see how that helps because of the cut out corner piece.
Anyway, even with the corner piece, I wouldn't know what to do.
 
Oops, I missed the part about the corner cut out...


I guess its back to x_bar y_bar in the first place then...

Well, it could still be done the way I was suggesting, don't know if its any easier though...but the point was to take out all area symmetrical about both axis, to simplify the problem.
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
14K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top