Centripetal Acceleration and Satellite Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed and orbital time of a satellite in circular orbit 600 km above Earth's surface, where the free-fall acceleration is 8.21 m/s². The initial calculations for speed using centripetal acceleration were incorrect due to a misunderstanding of the radius and unit conversions. The correct approach involves using the total radius of 7000 km (Earth's radius plus altitude) in the centripetal acceleration formula. The user also realized an error in calculating time, initially forgetting to convert kilometers to meters. Ultimately, the correct calculations resolved the issues, confirming that gravity provides the necessary centripetal force for the satellite's motion.
chihockey7
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. The astronaut orbiting the Earth in Figure P4.30 is preparing to dock with a Westar VI satellite. The satellite is in a circular orbit 600 km above the Earth's surface, where the free-fall acceleration is 8.21 m/s2. The radius of the Earth is 6400 km.
a) Determine the speed of the satellite. m/s
b) Determine the time required to complete one orbit around the Earth. min


2. Homework Equations [/b]
centripetal acceleration= v squared/ radius
distance*speed= time


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/b]
To solve for the speed I used 8.21 as the centripetal acceleration and made that equal to v squared/7000 and then solved for v.

8.21=v squared/7000
v= 239 m/s

I then took 14000*3.14 for the circumference of the orbit and multiplied that by 239 m/s for the total time to orbit and divided that by 60 to put the answer in minutes. I got 2919.94 minutes.

However, both answers are wrong. Can I not use the free fall acceleration for centripetal acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF,

chihockey7 said:
I then took 14000*3.14 for the circumference of the orbit and multiplied that by 239 m/s for the total time to orbit

Are you trying to claim that distance*speed = time? You might want to rethink that one...
 
chihockey7 said:
However, both answers are wrong. Can I not use the free fall acceleration for centripetal acceleration?

Yes, you can, and you should, because gravity is what is providing the centripetal force that keeps the satellite moving in a circle. You might have a computation error. Can you post your calculations for part a?
 
for part a I used the equation centripetal acceleration= v^2/ radius

8.21= v^2/(6400+600)
57470=v^2
v= 239.73

what is wrong with this calculation?

Concerning finding the time. I completely forgot that t=distance/speed.
 
I just realized my problem. I did not do the simple unit conversions from km to m. Everything worked out fine. Thanks for all of your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top