Centripetal Acceleration of a satellite above a planet of the Earth's radius.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the centripetal acceleration and orbital speed of a satellite orbiting a planet with the same radius and gravitational acceleration as Earth. The original poster presents an initial attempt to find the speed and time for one complete orbit, using the radius of Earth and the acceleration due to gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the original poster's calculation of speed, questioning the assumption that the satellite takes one year to orbit the planet. They suggest calculating the centripetal force and gravitational force to find the acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on using gravitational force to derive the necessary equations, while others have raised questions about the assumptions made in the original calculations. The conversation reflects a mix of interpretations and approaches without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the lack of mention of mass in the problem statement, leading to discussions about the relevance of mass in the calculations. The original poster has expressed difficulty in navigating the forum and understanding the symbols used.

mogsplanet
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A satellite is in orbit just above the surface of a spherical planet which has the same radius as Earth and the same acceleration of free fall at it's surface. Calculate:
i) Speed
ii) Time for 1 complete orbit.

Radius of Earth = 6400km or 6400000m and accel. of free fall = 9.81ms-2

Homework Equations


Speed (v) = (2pi)r/T

Cent. Accel. (a) = v2/r

Cent. Force. F = mv2/r = mw2r

The Attempt at a Solution



First time on here so finding it difficult to locate symbols so sorry for loss in translation.

My attempt of a solution is: v = (2xpi)x 6400000/3.1e7 (no of s in 1 year (365.25days))

v = 1.29ms-1
then plugged this into v2/r but this is heading down a blind alley.
Please Help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can't use LaTeX, "^" is standard for powers. Or [ sup]2[/sup] (without the first space).

Why would you believe "v = (2xpi)x 6400000/3.1e7" Are you assuming the satellite takes one year to orbit the planet?

The simplest thing to do is to calculate the centripetal force on the satellite- that is just the force holding in orbit which is just the gravitational force on the satellite:
[tex]F= -\frac{GmM}{r^2}[/tex]
"G" and "M" are those values for the Earth and m is the mass of the satellite, r is 6400 km.

And then, of course, F= ma so
[tex]a= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/tex]

Now, on the surface of the earth, the acceleration due to gravity is -9.81 and the radius is, to two significant figures, 6400 km! Adding another 6400 for the altitude of the satellite, we have r= 2(6400) so [itex]r^2= 4(6400)^2[/itex].
 
hi mogsplanet! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
mogsplanet said:
My attempt of a solution is: v = (2xpi)x 6400000/3.1e7 (no of s in 1 year (365.25days))

v = 1.29ms-1
then plugged this into v2/r …

what does the year have to do with it? :confused:

as usual, use good ol' https://www.physicsforums.com/library.php?do=view_item&itemid=26" F = ma …

what is the acceleration? what is the force? :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The question has no mention of mass so this should not be used. All the information I have is in the original question. It is A satellite in low orbit around a planet with same radius as the Earth.
 
Thanks for help. It has come to me now.

9.81 = v^2/6400000

So v = 7.9e3 ms-1

and so time for 1 orbit is (2pi)r/v
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K