Change in Amplitude with respect to Driven Frequencies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the amplitude of a mass-spring system when driven at frequencies slightly above and below its natural frequency, ω0. The amplitude calculations involve using the provided equations, particularly how the damping constant affects the amplitude at different driving frequencies. The user attempts to derive the amplitude for a driving frequency of 10% above and below ω0, encountering a rounding error in their calculations. Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between natural frequency (ω0) and driving frequency (ωd) in the amplitude formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying these frequencies in the context of the system's response.
Azer
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass-spring system has b/m = \omega_0/5 , where b is the damping constant and \omega_0 the natural frequency. How does its amplitude when driven at frequencies 10% above \omega_0 compare with its amplitude at \omega _0 ? How does its amplitude when driven at frequencies 10% below \omega_0 compare with its amplitude at \omega _0 ?

Homework Equations



(1) A(\omega) = \frac{F_0}{m\sqrt{(\omega^2_d - \omega^2_0)^2 + \frac{b^2\omega^2_0}{m^2}}}

(2) \omega^2_0=\frac{25b^2}{m^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Plugging in 1.1 for \omega_d in equation 1 (since it is 10% more than \omega_0 ) and using equation 2 to substitute \omega^2_0 for \frac{25b^2}{m^2} gives an amplitude of \frac{mF_0}{b^2}*1/7.25 . Plugging in 0 for the driving force yields an amplitude of \frac{mF_0}{b^2}*1/5 . The amplitude when driven over the amplitude given by the natural frequency should be 5/7.25*100%. Rounded to two sig figs, as my online homework demands, should yield 69%. It is telling me that I have made a rounding error, but I cannot find where.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\omega_0 should not change whether the system is driven or not. It is the natural frequency. \omega_d however, will be changing in each of the three calculations of amplitude.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top