Change in Amplitude with respect to Driven Frequencies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the amplitude of a mass-spring system when driven at frequencies slightly above and below its natural frequency, ω0. The amplitude calculations involve using the provided equations, particularly how the damping constant affects the amplitude at different driving frequencies. The user attempts to derive the amplitude for a driving frequency of 10% above and below ω0, encountering a rounding error in their calculations. Clarifications are made regarding the distinction between natural frequency (ω0) and driving frequency (ωd) in the amplitude formula. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying these frequencies in the context of the system's response.
Azer
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass-spring system has b/m = \omega_0/5 , where b is the damping constant and \omega_0 the natural frequency. How does its amplitude when driven at frequencies 10% above \omega_0 compare with its amplitude at \omega _0 ? How does its amplitude when driven at frequencies 10% below \omega_0 compare with its amplitude at \omega _0 ?

Homework Equations



(1) A(\omega) = \frac{F_0}{m\sqrt{(\omega^2_d - \omega^2_0)^2 + \frac{b^2\omega^2_0}{m^2}}}

(2) \omega^2_0=\frac{25b^2}{m^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Plugging in 1.1 for \omega_d in equation 1 (since it is 10% more than \omega_0 ) and using equation 2 to substitute \omega^2_0 for \frac{25b^2}{m^2} gives an amplitude of \frac{mF_0}{b^2}*1/7.25 . Plugging in 0 for the driving force yields an amplitude of \frac{mF_0}{b^2}*1/5 . The amplitude when driven over the amplitude given by the natural frequency should be 5/7.25*100%. Rounded to two sig figs, as my online homework demands, should yield 69%. It is telling me that I have made a rounding error, but I cannot find where.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\omega_0 should not change whether the system is driven or not. It is the natural frequency. \omega_d however, will be changing in each of the three calculations of amplitude.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top