Change in gravitational potential energy and work done against gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the change in gravitational potential energy and the work done against gravity for a child cycling up a hill. The child’s mass is 46.0 kg, and the vertical height is 5.25 m, leading to a calculated change in gravitational potential energy of 2366.7 J. However, there is confusion regarding the calculation of work done, with an incorrect attempt to subtract gravitational acceleration from energy units. Participants emphasize the need to use correct formulas and units, indicating that the approach to finding work done needs clarification. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between potential energy and work in physics.
Amber3046
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 46.0kg child cycles up a large hill to a point that is vertical distance of 5.25m above the starting position find:
a.) The change in the childs gravitational potential energy
b.) The amount of work done by the child against gravity


Homework Equations


delta Eg=mg delta h?
W=delta Eg-g?


The Attempt at a Solution


delta Eg=(46.0kg)(9.80m/s2)(5.25m)
delta Eg=2366.7 J {This number seems too high though, and it wouldn't be the change. I don't know how to get that}
W=2366.7-9.80
W=2356.9J


 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first part is ok, that is the change..

But for the second part, are you sure can do that??
Check the units..., you are subtracting joules from m/s^2
 
Thaakisfox said:
The first part is ok, that is the change..

But for the second part, are you sure can do that??
Check the units..., you are subtracting joules from m/s^2

I don't know if you can do that. It was just my guess, do you know how to do that?
 
what is the formula for the amount of work done that's given in your book. Write all of them
 
Well of course you can't do that. What was your line of thought that got you there? Maybe we can clear it up then ;)
 
Thaakisfox said:
Well of course you can't do that. What was your line of thought that got you there? Maybe we can clear it up then ;)

My line of thought was that I would take the Gravitational Potential Energy and subtract the acceleration of gravity (9.81m/s^2). I don't think that it's right, that was just something I tried.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top