Change in the object's kinetic energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the change in an object's kinetic energy as it moves from x=1 to x=3 meters, given a force function F(x)=3x^2 + 4. The work done, W, is calculated using the integral of the force function, resulting in W = 34 J, which contradicts the suggested answers of 12 J and 26 J. Participants clarify that W is derived from the force function, not the derivative, emphasizing the importance of the variable used (F(x) vs. F(t)). The consensus is that the correct change in kinetic energy is 34 J, indicating potential errors in the provided answer choices. The conversation highlights the significance of understanding the relationship between force and work in kinetic energy calculations.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
A force acting on an object given by the function F(x)=3x^2 + 4, where F is in Newtons and x is in meters. what is the change in the object's kinetic energy as it mores from x=1 to x=3 m?

W=6x
it changes from 6 J to 18 J
the answer 12 J is not the correct one
it says 26 J

why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why is W = 6x?
 
W=F’=∫P

F(x)=3x^2 + 4
F'(x)=6x
 
This is what i get

W = \int^{3}_{1} (3x^2 + 4)\vec{i} \cdot dx \vec{i}

W = x^3 + 4x]^{3}_{1} = 34 J

Work-Kinetic Energy Principle

\sum_{i=1}^{n} W_{i} = \Delta K

so

\Delta K = 34J
 
that's not even one of the choices. Does it matter if it was F(x) instead of F(t)?
 
Just so you know, i believe that 26 is wrong also.

EDIT*Looks like cyclovenom got there first. The 34 is correct.

Remember, W is not F', its the other way around.

F = W'


And yes it does matter if it was F(x) instead of F(t).
 
Last edited:
how would F be different if it was F(t)?
 
Parth Dave said:
Just so you know, i believe that 26 is wrong also.

And yes it does matter if it was F(x) instead of F(t).

I am with Parth Dave, are you sure about this, urban?
 
the packet must have a typo then

Cyclovenom, I never see you on ICQ :)
 
Back
Top