Changing from rectangular coordinate to sperical

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting the equation \( z^2 = x^2 + y^2 \) from rectangular coordinates to spherical coordinates. Participants are exploring the relationships between the variables in spherical coordinates and questioning the simplifications made in the transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the transformation of the equation into spherical coordinates and question the validity of certain algebraic steps. There is a focus on the interpretation of the resulting equations and the implications for the geometry of the surface described by the equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants identifying mistakes in reasoning and clarifying the relationship between the angles in spherical coordinates. Some guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of the surface and the values of \( \phi \) that correspond to different parts of the cone.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the constraints on \( \phi \) within the range \( 0 \leq \phi \leq \pi \) and are questioning whether values outside this range can be valid in the context of the problem.

tnutty
Messages
324
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



change from rectangle to spherical coordinate :

z^2 = x^2 + y^2


I know that :

z = pcos(phi)

x = psin(phi)cos(theta)

y = psin(phi)sin(theta)

there fore

z^2 = x^2 + y^2 in spherical coordinate is

p^2cos(phi)^2 = (psin(phi)cos(theta))^2 + (psin(phi)sin(theta))^2

=

cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)*cos^2(theta) + sin^2(phi)*sin^2(theta)

=

cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) + sin^2(phi)

=

cos^2(phi) = 2*sin^2(phi)


But the book has it as : cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) ?? what gives?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you conclude that sin^2(phi)*cos^2(theta) + sin^2(phi)*sin^2(theta) equals sin^2(phi) + sin^2(phi)??
 
tnutty said:
cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)*cos^2(theta) + sin^2(phi)*sin^2(theta)

=

cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) + sin^2(phi)

=

cos^2(phi) = 2*sin^2(phi)


But the book has it as : cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) ?? what gives?

Look at the third to the last line again:

cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)[cos^2(theta) + sin^2(theta)]

hope that helps.
 
tnutty said:
But the book has it as : cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi) ?? what gives?

Once you correct your mistake that Dick has pointed out, you might notice that your book's answer:

[tex]\cos^2(\phi) = \sin^2(\phi)[/tex]

while correct, isn't completely simplified. Can you see that the final answer should be of the form [itex]\phi = C[/itex] for the appropriate value of the constant C, and that the surface is actually one of the parameter surfaces for spherical coordinates?
 
Yes I see what I did wrong.

It is cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)

=

cos(phi) = sin(phi)

>>
. Can you see that the final answer should be of the form phi = C.
Yes I guess pi/2 would be correct.

So the equation z^2 = x^2 + y^2 is phi = pi/2 in spherical coord?
 
tnutty said:
Yes I see what I did wrong.

It is cos^2(phi) = sin^2(phi)

=

cos(phi) = sin(phi)

You mean [itex]|\cos(\phi)| = |\sin(\phi)|[/itex]
>>
. Can you see that the final answer should be of the form phi = C.
Yes I guess pi/2 would be correct.

So the equation z^2 = x^2 + y^2 is phi = pi/2 in spherical coord?

Nope. Guess again. Think about [itex]|\tan(\phi)| = 1[/itex].
 
I mean pi/4.
 
tnutty said:
I mean pi/4.

Remember [itex]\tan(\phi)[/itex] can be ± 1. [itex]\pi/4[/itex] will get you the top half of the cone. What value of [itex]\phi[/itex] will get you the bottom half?
 
-pi/4 ?

would this be ok : plus/minus : n*pi/4n : where n is a integer. OR no because phi is limited to 0 <= phi <= pi
 
  • #10
tnutty said:
-pi/4 ?

would this be ok :


plus/minus : n*pi/4n : where n is a integer. OR no because phi is limited to 0 <= phi <= pi

So if phi is between 0 and pi, what value gives the bottom half of the cone? Visualize the surface.
 
  • #11
Is there a bottom half? I don't think it will be within bounds because
only pi/4 would solve | tan(phi) | = 1 where 0<= phi <= pi.

| tan( -pi/4) |= 1 but that's no within bounds and

|tan( 5pi/4 ) |= 1 but that's also not within bounds, and those 2 points are the
next points which satisfies the equation.
 
  • #12
Yes, there is a bottom half. In your original xyz equation z can be negative. Draw a sketch of the cone, top and bottom. Just look at it. There obviously is a [itex]\phi[/itex] that gives the bottom half.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K