I Charge conjugation and spatial wave function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the contribution of the spatial wave function to the (-1)^L factor in charge conjugation symmetry. It explains that this factor arises when exchanging particle coordinates after applying the charge conjugation operator, which returns the state to its original form. The parity of the spatial wave functions during this exchange is represented by (-1)^L, where L is the angular momentum of the system. The interaction between a particle and its antiparticle demonstrates this concept, as their positions are exchanged under the charge conjugation operation. Overall, the (-1)^L factor is crucial for understanding the behavior of particle-antiparticle pairs under charge conjugation.
Josh1079
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm recently reading something which briefly introduces C symmetry. So the thing that confuses me is that how does the spatial wave function contribute the (-1)^L factor?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Josh1079 said:
Hi,

I'm recently reading something which briefly introduces C symmetry. So the thing that confuses me is that how does the spatial wave function contribute the (-1)^L factor?

Thanks!

It would be beneficial to point to your reference.

But I would imagine you're referring to a particle-anti particle pair after a C symmetry transformation. The (-1)^{L} factor comes from exchanging the particle coordinates in the spatial wave function after applying the C operator to return the state to its previous appearance. The parity of the spatial wave functions under that exchange is (-1)^{L}.
 
Suppose you have a particle A and an antiparticle \bar{A}... the system of two together is an eigenstate of the charge conjugation operator C... that is because:
C |A \bar{A}> = |\bar{A} A> =^{(?)} \lambda_C |A \bar{A}>
See the questionmark... again a reminder: a state |a> is an eigenstate of an operator O with eigenvalue c_a if the following equation holds: O |a> = c_a |a>.

Now again you asked where does the (-1)^L comes from. Well, L is the angular momentum of the system... This becomes obvious if you drew the particle-antiparticle pair, but on maths it becomes obvious if you assign to them their position x_{A}, \bar{x}_A for the particle and antiparticle respectively.
C |A (x_A) \bar{A}(\bar{x}_A)> = |\bar{A}(x_A) A(\bar{x}_A)> = (-1)^L |A(x_A) \bar{A}(\bar{x}_A)>
Since the middle step of the above equation is the parity applied on A which was on x_A and Abar which was on barx_A (got the positions exchanged)
(that's what happens in the spatial-coord space)
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...
Hello everyone, I am trying to calculate the energy loss and straggling of alpha particles with same energy, I used LISE++ to obtain the energy loss in every layer of the materials using Spectrometer Design of LISE++, but I can only calculate the energy-loss straggling layer by layer. Does anyone know the way to obtain the energy-loss straggling caused by every layer? Any help would be appreciated. J.

Similar threads