Charge Distrubution evenly on Arc (Radius R)

  • Thread starter Thread starter plat911
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arc Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the center of an arc with a uniformly distributed charge Q. The mathematical expression derived for the electric field E as a function of the angle θ is E = 2kQ/(πR²). There is confusion about the integration limits, with a suggestion to integrate from -θ0 to θ0 instead of -π/2 to π/2. Participants also express uncertainty about how to sketch the electric field as a function of θ, indicating that completing the solution is necessary before creating the plot. Overall, the focus is on refining the mathematical approach and understanding the graphical representation of the electric field.
plat911
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A charge Q is distributed evenly on a wire bent into an arc of radius R, as shown in
the figure below.What is the mathematical expression that describes the electric field
at the center of the arc (point P indicated) as a function of the angle θ? Sketch
a graph of the electric field as a function of θ for 0 < θ < 180.

I added the figure for the question as an attachment.



The Attempt at a Solution



lambda=Q/pi R

dE= kdQ/R^2
dE= (kdQ/R^2) cos θ

dQ=lambda dl
dl= Rd theta
dQ=lambda R dθ

dE=(k[lambda R d θ]/R^2)cos θ


E=(k lambda R cos θ/R^2)d θ(from pi/2 to -pi/2)
E=k lambda/R cos θ dθ
E=k lambda/Rsin θ
E=k lambda/R[sin(pi/2)-sin(-pi/2)]
E=k lambda/2R
E=k(Q/piR)/2R=2kQ/piR^2
E= 2kq/piR^2

Is this right? I used K for 1/4pi(E) to make it easier to type.
Also i am kind of lost on what is expected for the sketch.
 

Attachments

  • physics.jpg
    physics.jpg
    5.1 KB · Views: 831
Physics news on Phys.org
looks good ... might make more sense if the E-field component was upward (to balance gravity, if you put a charged item in the center, say)
 
Why are you integrating from -π/2 to π/2 ?

Integrate from -θ0 to θ0 or similar.
 
i didn't notice that. i was integrating from the wrong limits. Thank you for pointing that out. I am still confused on the sketch of the electric field as a function of theta if anyone could point me in the right direction with this it would be much appreciated.
 
Finish working out the solution before you can do the plot.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top