Charge of antimony pentafluoride

  • Thread starter Thread starter coconut62
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dot-and-cross diagram for antimony pentafluoride (SbF5) and the confusion regarding its charge. The original poster questions the presence of a charge on the molecule, noting that their diagram does not show any extra electrons. They reference a website to clarify that SbF5 does not have a charge. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding molecular structure and electron distribution in determining the charge of a compound.
coconut62
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
There's a question in my class test paper today which requires us to draw the dot-and-cross diagram for SbF5.

There's a charge on that molecule.

I drew it like this: (attached image)

Where does the charge come from? I don't even see any extra electrons. :shy:
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 1,239
Chemistry news on Phys.org
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top