Charge on a particle above a seemingly infinite charge plane

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strength and charge of a particle above an infinite charge plane. The surface charge density is determined to be -1.25E-6 C/m^2, leading to an electric field strength of -700621 N/C. The gravitational force on the particle is calculated as 1.962E-5 N. By rearranging the formula E=F/q, the charge is found to be approximately -2.8 E-10 C. The importance of ensuring proper unit consistency in calculations is also emphasized.
Amay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 2.0 m × 4.0 m flat carpet acquires a uniformly distributed charge of −10 μC after you and your friends walk across it several times. A 2.0 μg dust particle is suspended in midair just above the center of the carpet.

What is the charge on the dust particle?
Relevant Equations
F= ma
E= σ/2e0 (σ is the surface charge density and e0 is epsilon naught)
E= F/q
At first I take the uniformly distributed charge and then divide it by the area of the carpet to get the surface charge density σ

-10E-6 C / 8m^2 = σ = -1.25E-6C/m^2

Then I divide the surface charge density by 2e0 to get the electric field strength caused by the infinite plane

-1.25E-6/(2(8.85E-12 C^2/N.m^2 )) = -700621. N/C = E

Then I take the gravitational force on the particle

F = (2E-6)(9.81m/s^2) = 1.962E-5 N

Then I re arrange the formula of E=F/q to be have q on one side and then I substitute in numbers.

qE= F q= F/E

(1.962E-5 N) / (-700621N/C) = -2.778192 E-10 C or -2.8 E-10 C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your method is fine but the unit of mass in MKS (SI) is kg, so check your units again and make sure all is copacetic...
 
hutchphd said:
Your method is fine but the unit of mass in MKS (SI) is kg, so check your units again and make sure all is copacetic...
Ah, yes, Thank you very much.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top