Charge on a point P from a uniform rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at point P due to a uniformly charged rod with a total charge of q = 3.50 x 10^-9 C and length L = 0.8 m, positioned 0.6 m away from the midpoint. The initial attempt at solving the problem used the equation E = k ∫ λ dx/r^2, but it was pointed out that the approach was incorrect due to the need to consider the vector nature of the electric field. The symmetry of the charge distribution allows for simplification by focusing on the relevant directional components, which alters the integrand. Additionally, a factor of H was noted to be missing in the evaluation of the integral. The correct formulation is essential for accurately determining the electric field's magnitude at point P.
motyapa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Consider a total charge of q = 3.50
multiply.gif
10^-9 C spread uniformly over a thin rod of length L = 0.8 m as shown. Point P is a distance H = 0.6 m away from the midpoint of the rod. Find the magnitude of the electric field at point P.

Relevant equations:

E = k \int \lambda dx/r^2 where
\lambda = q/L and
r = \sqrt{x^2 + H^2}

Attempt at solution

E = k \int_{-.4}^{.4} \lambda dx/r^2
E = k \int_{-.4}^{.4} q dx/(L)(x^2 + H^2)
E = (kq/L) \int_{-.4}^{.4} dx/(x^2 + H^2)
E = (kq/L) \arctan(x/H) |^.4 _{-.4}

plugging in k = 9 x 10^9, q = 3.5 x 10^-9, L = .8, H = .6 I get 46.3 N/C but this is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your very first equation is wrong. The field from a point charge is a vector, and the net field from the distribution of charge is the integral of that vector.
In the present case, there is a symmetry which allows you to figure out the direction of the resulting vector straight away. This means you only need to consider the component in that direction, reducing it to the integral of a scalar, but the integrand will be different.
 
In addition to haruspex' post: there is a factor H missing where you evaluate the integral.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top