Charge relocation for Parallel Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
When a charged capacitor is connected in parallel with an initially uncharged capacitor, the voltage across both capacitors becomes equal, leading to a redistribution of charge. The total energy stored after this redistribution is not simply additive; instead, the new energy stored is less than the initial energy due to the voltage drop. The energy loss can be attributed to the heat generated in a resistor if one is placed between the capacitors during the connection process. This scenario highlights the importance of understanding energy conservation and the effects of connecting capacitors in parallel. The discussion emphasizes the need to reassess initial assumptions about energy storage in capacitors.
TRovang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The question states: A charged capacitor C has stored energy U = 10.0J. A second, equal but initially uncharged capacitor (no energy stored) is then connected to the first in parallel.
(a) What is the new net energy stored after the charge is redistributed?
(b) Where did the excess energy go?Relevant equations include:
U = 1/2*Q2/C
V = Q/C

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is stating that the voltage drop across both capacitors will be the same once the second is placed in parallel. This gives me the equation:
V = Qo/Co = Q1/C1

Also, since the capacitance adds together I get C1 = 2*Co

Thus, using the first equation and the second I got Qo = 1/2*Q1

Now I have U = 10.0 = Qo2/(2*Co)

However the denominator is simply C1 so I get C1*10.0 = Qo2

Now subbing in for Qo I finally get C1*10.0 = Q12/4.

This rearranges to give 20 = Q12/(2*C1) = U1.

Thus I find that the new net energy stored is actually 20J. This implies that part (b) makes absolutely no sense or I am completely wrong in my derivations.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TRovang said:
The question states: A charged capacitor C has stored energy U = 10.0J. A second, equal but initially uncharged capacitor (no energy stored) is then connected to the first in parallel.
(a) What is the new net energy stored after the charge is redistributed?
(b) Where did the excess energy go?


Relevant equations include:
U = 1/2*Q2/C
V = Q/C

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is stating that the voltage drop across both capacitors will be the same once the second is placed in parallel. This gives me the equation:
V = Qo/Co = Q1/C1

Also, since the capacitance adds together I get C1 = 2*Co

Thus, using the first equation and the second I got Qo = 1/2*Q1

Now I have U = 10.0 = Qo2/(2*Co)

However the denominator is simply C1 so I get C1*10.0 = Qo2

Now subbing in for Qo I finally get C1*10.0 = Q12/4.

This rearranges to give 20 = Q12/(2*C1) = U1.

Thus I find that the new net energy stored is actually 20J. This implies that part (b) makes absolutely no sense or I am completely wrong in my derivations.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

It looks like your initial assumptions are not right.

Start with the one capacitor all by itself, and Qo = Co * Vo

After you connect the 2nd capacitor, the charge Q gets evenly distributed across the two capacitors, so the voltage drops. What does it drop to? What is the initial energy of the one cap at the higher voltage compared to the final energy of the two caps at the lower voltage?

Then for part b -- this is a very commonly asked question for this problem. You can probably find it with a search here at the PF (it gets asked quite often), but basically the way to get a handle on it is to put a test resistor between the two caps, and work out the energy loss in the resistor as you connect the two caps together. Do this with a value R, and then a value R/10, and a value R/100, and so on. Do you see something useful ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
8K
Back
Top