Charge to Mass Ratio Calculation for Object

  • Thread starter Thread starter koolmerliner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Mass Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the charge-to-mass ratio (q/m) of an object projected into a uniform electric field between parallel plates. The electric field is 600 N/C, and the object is deflected downward by 1.35 cm after traveling 56 cm. Initial calculations for charge (q) and mass (m) were attempted using kinematics and electric force equations, but some misunderstandings about the uniform electric field versus point charge fields were noted. The correct approach emphasizes the relationship ay = qE/m, prompting a reevaluation of how to express q/m in terms of known quantities. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly applying physics principles in uniform fields for accurate results.
koolmerliner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small object with mass m, charge q, and initial speed v0 = 6.00×10^3 m/s is projected into a uniform electric field between two parallel metal plates of length 26.0 cm(Figure 1) . The electric field between the plates is directed downward and has magnitude E = 600 N/C . Assume that the field is zero outside the region between the plates. The separation between the plates is large enough for the object to pass between the plates without hitting the lower plate. After passing through the field region, the object is deflected downward a vertical distance d = 1.35 cm from its original direction of motion and reaches a collecting plate that is 56.0 cm from the edge of the parallel plates. Ignore gravity and air resistance.

Part A
Calculate the object's charge-to-mass ratio, q/m.

fdU8nnS.jpg


Homework Equations


E = F/q
E=kq/r^2
kinematics

The Attempt at a Solution


I solved for q by using E = kq/r^2[/B]
Er^2/k = q
(600 N/C)(.26 m)^2 / 9x10^9 Nm^2/C^2 = q
q = 4.51 * 10^-9 C

My plan for mass is

Eq = F = ma
Eq/a = m

Using Kinematics
Solving for time t

x - x0 =1/2(v0x + vx)t
2(x-x0)/(v0x + vx) = t
2(.56m)/(2 * 6 *10^3 m/s) = t
t = 9.33*10^-5 s


Solving for Acceleration y-axis ay

y = y0 + v0yt + (1/2)ayt^2
2(y - y0 - v0yt)/t^2 = ay
2(.56m)/t^2 = ay
ay = 3127478 m/s


Eq/a = m

m = 8.668 * 10^-13 kg

q/m = 5203 wrong answer


 
Physics news on Phys.org
koolmerliner said:
2(.56m)/t^2 = ay
The acceleration only applies while between the plates. Break the problem into two parts.
 
And while you do what haruspex suggested, consider that the E-field in which the particle travels is not kq/r^2, which is the field generated by a point charge, but a uniform field of 600 N/C generated by external charges on the plates.
 
I tried solving for Vy(in plates) which is equal to V0y and Vy (outside the plates)
y-y0 = 1/2(2Vy)t
(-0.0135m)/t = Vy
t = 5 * 10^-5 s (outside the from 26 to 56) calculated wrong in post
Vy = (-0.0135m)/t = -270 m/s

Now solving for t (x=0 to x=.26m)
(x-x0) = (1/2)(v0x + v0x)t
(.26m)/(6.00 * 10^3 m/s) = t
t = 4.33*10^-5 s

ay = (-270m/s)/ t
ay = 6235565 m/s^2
 
Last edited:
A "previous question" is often an unreliable source. Here you don't have a line of charge, just a moving charge in a uniform electric field. The electric field in the line of charge question does not have the same dependence on space coordinates (it looks different if you draw field lines in space) as a uniform electric field, which is what you have here. Therefore, it is incorrect to use the line-of-charge of expression where it does not apply and expect to make sense out of it.

I have not done the math yet to see if your number for ay is correct. Assuming that it is, can you find an expression for ay in terms of the charge q, the external electric field E and the mass m?
 
kuruman said:
A "previous question" is often an unreliable source. Here you don't have a line of charge, just a moving charge in a uniform electric field. The electric field in the line of charge question does not have the same dependence on space coordinates (it looks different if you draw field lines in space) as a uniform electric field, which is what you have here. Therefore, it is incorrect to use the line-of-charge of expression where it does not apply and expect to make sense out of it.

I have not done the math yet to see if your number for ay is correct. Assuming that it is, can you find an expression for ay in terms of the charge q, the external electric field E and the mass m?

ay = qE/m
 
Right. Now look at the equation. What quantity are you trying to find and how can you write it in terms of known quantities?
 
Back
Top