Checking the Solution to -√2: Is It Right?

[zenterix]

Homework Statement

Calculate the line integral with respect to arc length.

$\int_C (x+y)ds$, where $C$ is the triangle with vertices $(0,0), (1,0)$ and $(0,1)$, traversed in a counterclockwise direction.

Relevant Equations

There are three separate paths on the triangle with parametric equations

$$\vec{r_1}(t)=\langle t,0 \rangle$$
$$\vec{r_2}(t)=\langle 1-t,t \rangle$$
$$\vec{r_3}(t)=\langle 0,1-t \rangle$$

The corresponding velocity vectors are
$$\vec{v_1}(t)=\langle 1,0 \rangle$$
$$\vec{v_2}(t)=\langle -1,1 \rangle$$
$$\vec{v_3}(t)=\langle 0,-1 \rangle$$

and speeds

$$v_1(t)=1$$
$$v_2(t)=\sqrt{2}$$
$$v_3(t)=1$$

The line integral then becomes

$$\int_C (x+y)ds = \int_0^1 t dt+\int_0^1 \sqrt{2} dt+\int_0^1 (1-t)dt$$

$$=1/2+\sqrt{2}+1-1/2$$

$$=\sqrt{2}+1$$

The answer at the end of the book says $-\sqrt{2}$.

Is this correct or is my solution correct?

Here is a depiction of the path where we are integrating

 

[andrewkirk]

We can see the book solution is wrong without doing any integrating. The integrand $(x+y)$ is positive everywhere along the line of integration, and $ds$ is always positive by definition. So the integral has to be positive. So it can't be $-\sqrt 2$.
Your approach looks reasonable.

 

[haruspex]

Maybe we are missing some context here.
The diagram shows a specified path around the loop. The given answer works if we allow ds to be signed, e.g. going from (0,1) to (0,0) giving the opposite sign to the reverse direction. That would be how a line integral works in a vector field or in the complex plane. And complex analysis is what I associate with the name Apostol.

 

[FactChecker]

Maybe we are missing some context here.
The diagram shows a specified path around the loop. The given answer works if we allow ds to be signed, e.g. going from (0,1) to (0,0) giving the opposite sign to the reverse direction. That would be how a line integral works in a vector field or in the complex plane. And complex analysis is what I associate with the name Apostol.

My interpretation of ds would be a change of length in a parameterized path. So the counter-clockwise path has a positive ds going down the Y-axis.

 

[pasmith]

This is exercise 7 in section 10.9 of Apostol, Calculus Vol II (2nd ed). For context, on pages 329-330, the following definition is given:

Let \alpha be a path with \alpha&#039; continuous on [a,b]. The graph of \alpha is a rectifiable curve. In Volume I we proved that the corresponding arc length integral is given by <br /> s(t) = \int_a^t \|\alpha&#039;(u)\|\,du The derivative of arc length is given by <br /> s&#039;(t) = \|\alpha&#039;(t)\|. Let \phi be a scalar field, defined and bounded on C, the graph of \alpha. The line integral of \phi with respect to arc length along C is given by <br /> \int_C \phi\,ds = \int_a^b \phi(\alpha(t))s&#039;(t)\,dt, whenever the integral on the right exists.

The OP's calculations would therefore appear to be correct, and the answer given in the book is wrong. Searching for errata turned up this exchange from 2015:

I am studying calculus using apostol, I found that some answers at the back are wrong. I tried to search for an errata copy but can't find any. Does anyone know how to get one or has a list of errors?

I would contact the publisher

I should note that I did check Wiley's website, but no errata are given there.

 

[mathwonk]

As a quick check, note that, on each segment, the integral equals the average value of the integrand times the length of the segment. This average value is 1/2 on each of the segments of length one, and 1 on the segment of length sqrt(2), hence it seems the total integral is 1+sqrt(2) as stated, even with no pencil and paper computation at all. I.e. an integral is just a way of computing an average value, so when that average is obvious, little work is needed.