Chemical Kinetics: Understanding the Reaction of A & B

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the reaction kinetics of substances A and B, noting that a decrease of 0.03 M in A should correspond to a 0.05 M concentration of B. The calculated rate constant k is 14.87 l/(mol*h), leading to a half-life (t1/2) of 1.34 hours for A, which appears inconsistent since more than 50% of A reacted in one hour. Participants clarify that the relationship between rate constant and half-life applies only when concentrations of A and B are equal. The final resolution indicates that a revised half-life of 0.756 hours for A aligns better with the observed reaction dynamics.
krootox217
Messages
51
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The task is the following:
e6rlc6W.jpg


If the concentration of A decreases 0.03 M in one hour, then the concentration of B should to, which means, [ B] should be 0.05 M?

And if I try to calculate k, i get 14.87 l/(mol*h)

For second order reactions, t1/2 sould be 1/(k*[A]0)

So I get 1.34 h as t1/2 for substance A, which somehow doesn't make sence, since more than 50% of the substance reacted in one hour. For B i get 9.29h, which doesn't make sense too. Can me someone tell my mistake?

Homework Equations


see above

The Attempt at a Solution


see above
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
krootox217 said:

Homework Statement


The task is the following:
e6rlc6W.jpg


If the concentration of A decreases 0.03 M in one hour, then the concentration of B should to, which means, [ B] should be 0.05 M?

And if I try to calculate k, i get 14.87 l/(mol*h)

For second order reactions, t1/2 sould be 1/(k*[A]0)

So I get 1.34 h as t1/2 for substance A, which somehow doesn't make sence, since more than 50% of the substance reacted in one hour. For B i get 9.29h, which doesn't make sense too. Can me someone tell my mistake?

Homework Equations


see above

The Attempt at a Solution


see above

If the concentration of A decreases 0.03 M in one hour, then the concentration of B should to, which means, [ B] should be 0.05 M? YES

I calculated the same rate constant as you.

Always good to check for reasonableness.

However I think that the simple relation of rate constant to half life only applies for the case of equal concentrations [A] = [ B]. ?

I am not sure there is any useful simple relation like that when these two are not equal. So I think you will have to work out each case using the full integrated rate equation, e.g. With [A]/[A0] = ½ and [ B] = [ B0] - [A0]/2 etc.
 
Ok, thanks for the answer, I found a way, where t1/2 for A yields 0.756h, which seems to make sence, at least for this reaction :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top