Chemical potential at equlibrium

AI Thread Summary
At equilibrium, the value of the chemical potential of a substance is often considered to be zero, but some discussions emphasize that it is the change in chemical potential that is zero, not the individual potentials. The chemical potential is mathematically defined as the derivative of internal energy at constant entropy and volume, or as the partial derivative of Gibbs free energy with respect to the number of moles at constant temperature and pressure. The criterion for equilibrium in a chemical reaction is the minimization of Gibbs free energy. This distinction is crucial for understanding chemical thermodynamics and the behavior of reacting mixtures. Clarifying these definitions enhances comprehension of equilibrium conditions in chemical systems.
LalithP
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What is the value of chemical potential of a substance at equilibrium?
According to following article it is zero:

https://www.uni-muenster.de/Physik....hen/Forschungsschwerpunkte/mBECwatfratcp.html

But I have seen in many articles that it is the change in chemical potential (ie. stoichimetric sum of chemical potentials) is zero, not individual chemical potentials. Could somebody clarify this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your understanding of the mathematical definition of "chemical potential?"
 
I think I know the basics like, it is the derivative of internal energy at constant entropy and volume or the partial derivative Helmholtz free energy at constant temperature and volume...
 
The most useful version is the partial derivative of the gibbs free energy G with respect to the number of moles of a given species at constant temperature and pressure. This is the form most extensively used in chemical thermodynamics. The equilibrium criterion for a chemical reacting mixture is that the gibbs free energy is minimized.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top