China aims to be first to land probe on moon's far side

  • Thread starter Thread starter PF_SpaceNews
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China Probe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around China's plans to land a probe on the far side of the Moon, highlighting the challenges of communication and referencing cultural works related to space exploration. The scope includes technical aspects of lunar exploration and speculative commentary.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express surprise that no probe has landed on the far side of the Moon before.
  • Questions arise regarding the difficulties of communication with the far side of the Moon, with some assuming that existing deep space communication equipment may not suffice.
  • One participant suggests that an orbiter around the Moon would be necessary for effective communication, while noting that other locations, such as Lagrangian points, could theoretically work but may have limitations in data rates.
  • A participant references a fictional scenario from Arthur C. Clarke's "2010: Odyssey Two," drawing parallels between the narrative and the potential challenges faced by the Chinese mission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about communication challenges and the technical requirements for the mission, indicating that multiple views and questions remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about communication technology and the lack of clarity on the specific capabilities of existing lunar orbiters or other potential communication satellites.

PF_SpaceNews
China aims to be first to land probe on moon's far side

China's increasingly ambitious space program plans to attempt the first-ever landing of a lunar probe on the moon's far side, a leading engineer said.

Continue reading...
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I wasn't aware that no one had landed a probe on the far side of the Moon before.
 
Drakkith said:
I wasn't aware that no one had landed a probe on the far side of the Moon before.
Are communications more difficult?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Are communications more difficult?

I assume so. I don't think any of our deep space communication equipment can talk with the far side of the Moon, but I'm not certain.
 
You need an orbiter around Moon. In principle probes at the Earth/Sun Lagrangian points or around the Earth/Moon L2 would work as well, but the larger distance means the data rate goes down, and I'm not aware of satellites there designed for such a task.

Interplanetary communication (e. g. with probes on Mars) works well with a huge antenna on Earth, but a satellite-to-satellite communication like that would give a negligible data rate.
 
PF_SpaceNews said:
China's increasingly ambitious space program

Did anyone read the book, 2010: Odyssey Two? By Arthur C. Clarke? I did. I actually claim that the movie adaptation with Roy Scheider (1984) is my favorite movie of all time (I always wanted to be Heywood Floyd with the hot Oceanographer wife and the dolphin pool inside my kitchen), with the movie "Pi" (1998) coming in a close second.

In any case, Arthur had the prescience to have a spot in the book (if my memory serves correct) where the Chinese beat us to the first landing on Europa, only to be greeted by creepy, black tentacles emerging through cracks in the ice to suck them down underneath that icy crust. Of course, their radio communications got abruptly interrupted. I don't know if Europa has an atmosphere, but I hear that in space, "no one can hear you scream." :H

Let's just hope that the Chinese don't encounter this same fate on the dark side of the moon...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
14K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K