Choosing a partner in chemistry courses at a university or college

AI Thread Summary
When selecting partners for chemistry courses, individuals often prioritize comfort and efficiency over personal relationships. Many find that working with friends can hinder productivity, as dynamics may lead to slower progress due to expectations of leniency or indecisiveness. Instead, choosing partners who exhibit independence and self-sufficiency is favored, allowing for a more effective division of labor. The belief that grades do not accurately reflect practical abilities is common, as some high-achieving students may lack essential hands-on skills. Additionally, pairing with someone perceived as more capable can create a motivating environment, pushing individuals to perform better. In structured lab settings, partner assignments are typically predetermined, which can limit personal choice but also reduce anxiety about performance. Overall, the emphasis is on finding partners who contribute to a productive and efficient learning experience.
Jurrasic
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
What method do you use to pair up with a partner or multiple partners when taking a chemistry course?
What is it about the partner that you picked that made you pick them? :)

Does your method ever include avoiding people who you think are important so that you don't pair up with people who you could potentially embarrass yourself around if you screw up? Just to kind of pair up with people who you are totally neutral with and comfortable with? Or do you try to pair up with someone who you regard highly?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I dont' specialize in chemistry but I think choosing partners are more or less the same, here is my experience so far:

- pairing up with friends probably isn't a good idea, I always find that I get the work done the fastest with people I don't normally talk to. Maybe I tend to be bossy around my friends or something but with friends they always like to wait for me to say what to do next which makes everything slower etc. But basically being friends they will expect more room for error.

- grades don't reflect abilities. yeah, i thought grades can at least be some sort of reference, but no, sometimes no at all. being able to write down the right answers in an exam script doesn't mean the person can carry a flask from one bench to another without spilling half the contents on the floor and the other half on himself.

- this sounds weird but independence is what I look for. if someone can work by him/herself then we can just divid up the work and part ways, come back and summarise our work. I have meet a lot of people what are totally incapable of independant thought and asks for guidance/confirmation every step of the way, and that is not going to be efficient.

tbh, those points are everything I didn't do, I now have to work with someone that drives my blood pressure miles high everytime I'm in college. Things is, looking back on I should have picked up the signs years ago before I chose him as my work partner, so I only have myself to blame.

Given the choice I tend to pair up with someone who I think is more capable then I am, so there will be an ongoing pressure to keep up with them and things get done faster that way.

Good luck :)
 
You have a choice? Usually, in any physics/chemistry based labs that I've had, we rotated lab partners and it was chosen for us.
 
Two selection criteria to avoid:

"choose lookers",

"Work with the barely competent: it eliminates the anxiety of slacking off"..


If that doesn't give you sufficient insight, pick the smartest person(s) who will work with you.
 
For a lab, it normally ended up being whoever I was standing next to on the first day
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top