Circular motion at end of string in horizontal plane

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about a mass m undergoing uniform circular motion at the end of a string in a horizontal plane, the centripetal acceleration a is derived from the tension T in the string and the angle θ it makes with the vertical. The equations show that T cos θ equals mg and T sin θ equals mrω², leading to the relationship between sin θ, radius r, and angular velocity ω. A key point raised is the condition for the derived equation a = rω² = √(l²ω⁴ - g²), which implies a restriction that l²ω⁴ must be greater than or equal to g². The conversation clarifies that ω is not arbitrary and has a minimum value of ω = √(g/l), which is relevant for small angles in pendulum motion. The discussion concludes that the initial concerns about the equation were resolved, affirming its validity.
fouquoit
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Suppose a mass m suspended from a string of length l is undergoing uniform circular motion in a horizontal plane, with angular velocity ω. Calculate the centripetal acceleration a.

If T is the tension in the string, and θ the angle the string makes with the vertical, then the vertical and horizontal components are:

T cos θ = mg
T sin θ = mrω²

Dividing the latter by the former gives: \frac{\sin \theta}{\cos \theta}=\frac{\sin \theta}{\sqrt{1-\sin^{2}\theta}}=\frac{r \omega^{2}}{g}

If r is the radius of the circle, then \sin \theta=\frac{r}{l}, and substituting for sin θ gives:

\frac{\frac{r}{l}}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{r}{l})^{2}}}=\frac{r \omega^{2}}{g}

Rearranging gives a=r\omega^{2}=\sqrt{l^{2}\omega^{4}-g^2}}

Now, the thing that I find strange about this result is that, to be able to take the square root, we need l^{2}\omega^{4}\geq g^2, but physically there seems to be no such restriction, since l and ω are arbitrary and can be as small as one likes.

Where have I gone wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fouquoit said:
Rearranging gives a=r\omega^{2}=\sqrt{l^{2}\omega^{4}-g^2}}
How did you do this rearrangement?
 
The parameters may not be so arbritrary. If l is small then w may end up large because of the effect of gravity and the the relatively small radius r.
 
OK, thanks. I think I've got it. There is actually nothing wrong with the equation I derived.

As the prevois poster pointed out, ω is not arbitrary. In fact ω just has a lower limit given by \omega=\sqrt{\frac{g}{l}}, which corresponds to the frequency of a pendulum oscillating at low amplitude.
 
\omega=\sqrt{\frac{g}{l\cos\theta}}

Which has the limit for small angles as you point out. Good stuff!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top