Circulation & Flux: Confirmation Needed | Differentiate1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Differentiate1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circulation Flux
Differentiate1
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Here's my work: http://i.imgur.com/9ik31P5.png

I need confirmation that the vector fields I found for parts 1) and 2) are correct. I also need to figure out how to find the flux in part 2) when the problem doesn't give any boundaries to evaluate. For part 1), the answer can be found by concluding that the vector field F is conservative (zero circulation).

Thanks in advance,

Differentiate1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your answer for part 1) looks good to me. For part 2), I really don't understand the question. It says to imagine integral ##I## as a flux integral for a vector field ##F## but that doesn't make any sense, because integral ##I## is definitely a line integral, as you used it in part 1). The integral ##I## can't be both a line integral and a surface integral, so I don't know what is happening there.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Well, you can in fact relate a surface integral and a line integral along its closed boundary curve. Just think about the integral theorems of vector calculus :-).
 
hmm. That's true. But the thing that is being related is only the curve. In the question, there is no curve given. So there is nothing to relate.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top