Clarification about friction equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter rash219
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the application of friction equations for an object on a ramp at rest and sliding downwards. For an object at rest, the equations correctly balance forces with static friction, while for a sliding object, kinetic friction should be used. It is emphasized that static friction cannot be considered when the object is accelerating, and the actual value of static friction may be less than the maximum value represented by μ_s * n. Participants highlight the importance of correctly applying these concepts to solve related physics problems. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate calculations involving friction.
rash219
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Clarification about friction equation !

Homework Statement



Suppose there is an object on the top of a ramp at a rest would these equation/s be correct to preform calculations considering friction applies

\SigmaF_y = n - (m * g * Cos\Theta) = 0
\SigmaF_x = (m * g * Sin\Theta) - (\mu_s * n) = 0

Suppose there is an object on the top of a ramp was sliding downwards would these equation/s be correct to preform calculations considering friction applies

\SigmaF_y = n - (m * g * Cos\Theta) = 0
\SigmaF_x = (m * g * Sin\Theta) - (\mu_s * n) = (m * a) or
\SigmaF_x = (m * g * Sin\Theta) - (\mu_k * n) = (m * a)

Note : (\mu_k * n) would be located at (\mu_s * n)


http://img40.imagevenue.com/loc876/th_28739_dig_122_876lo.jpg


My Question is are these formulas correctly represented so that i could solve any question that involves static and kinetic friction
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep. That's pretty much it. Except you can't consider static friction when an object is accelerating, better put a=0 in that case, as you did the first paragraph. Good luck with actually solving problems!
 
Thanks ! Understood...
 
Careful with setting static friction equal to \mu_s N. That's the maximum value of static friction--the actual value may well be less.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top