Clarification on an electric fields solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a question regarding the conversion of electric field components into cylindrical coordinates. The user queries why the radius "a" loses its exponent during this conversion. The response clarifies that this occurs because the differential length element dℓ is expressed as a·dθ, which is derived from the arc length formula. This relationship simplifies the expression for the electric field, leading to the observed change. The conversation emphasizes understanding the underlying geometry in cylindrical coordinates.
Allenman
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
This isn't actually a homework problem. I just had a question about the solution they provided.

Homework Statement


physprob96.png



2. Solution given in solutions manual
physsol96.png



3. My question

When they convert dE into cylindrical coordinates why does the radius "a" lose its exponent?

dE = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta l}{a^{2}} = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta\theta}{a}

I have to be missing something simple, I just know it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Allenman said:
This isn't actually a homework problem. I just had a question about the solution they provided.

Homework Statement


physprob96.png


2. Solution given in solutions manual
physsol96.png


3. My question

When they convert dE into cylindrical coordinates why does the radius "a" lose its exponent?

dE = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta l}{a^{2}} = \frac{\kappa\lambda\delta\theta}{a}

I have to be missing something simple, I just know it...
It's because d\ell=a\cdot d\theta\,.
 
Does that come from the arc length formula?

Thank you
 
Yes it does.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top