Classic Angular momentum problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a classic angular momentum problem involving a collision between a piece of putty and a rod in a frictionless environment. The participant initially calculated the center-of-mass velocity after the collision but questioned the result, suspecting an error due to the unexpected increase in speed. Feedback clarified that the moment of inertia calculation must account for the putty's mass correctly, as it alters the system's dynamics. The participant then sought assistance in determining the angular speed and angular momentum post-collision, revealing confusion about the appropriate formulas to use. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying physics principles in collision scenarios.
TheOriginalTy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Assume: This collision takes place in outer
space where there is no gravitational field and no friction.
A small piece of putty of mass 31 g and negligible size has a speed of 2.5 m/s. It makes a collision with a rod of length 3 cm and mass 83 g (initially at rest) such that the putty hits the very end of the rod. The putty sticks to the end of the rod and spins around after the collision.

After the collisions the center-of-mass has a linear velocity V and an angular velocity ω about the center-of-mass “+ cm”.
What is the velocity V of the center-of-mass of the system after the collision?
Answer in units of m/s.

Homework Equations



Icm = 1/12 MR^2
Ipm = MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



First I said that that the moment of inertia for the system is
I=1/12(M+m)R^2 ("M" being the mass of the rod and "m" being the mass of the putty)

Then using conservation of angular momentum i got:

mR^2w = (R^2/12)(M+m)w

substituting the respect v's (and Rs) in for w i got:
mv1R = (R/12)(M+m)v2

then

v2 = 12mv1/(M+m)

plugging in my numbers i got [12(31)(2.5)]/[(31+83)] = 8.16 m/s
Is this correct or did I leave something out? The answer doesn't look right to me just because it's 3 times bigger than the original velocity, but I'm not sure at all.

Feedback?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi TheOriginalTy! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
TheOriginalTy said:
I=1/12(M+m)R^2 ("M" being the mass of the rod and "m" being the mass of the putty)

Nooo :redface: … m is a lump, not a rod! :biggrin:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi TheOriginalTy! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


Nooo :redface: … m is a lump, not a rod! :biggrin:



Once it sticks to the rod doesn't the moment of inertia of the rod include the mass of the putty lump as well? Considering that it said that size is negligible so it doesn't change the shape of the rod.
 
TheOriginalTy said:
Considering that it said that size is negligible so it doesn't change the shape of the rod.

It does change the shape of the rod!

The rod used to be uniform, now it's got a lump on the end!

Only if the putty was spread out over the whole rod could you just add the masses.

1/12 MR2 is only for a uniform rod.
 
Okay thanks. I understand that now. I got 0.6798 as the velocity and that's correct. but now I have another problem.

I need to find the angular speed and the angular momentum right after the collision.

for angular speed i used that w= v/r and had 0.6798(m/s) /.015 (m) = 45.32 (rad/s)

But this is not correct. help?


Also. for angular momentum I got L= I*v/r and had (1/12M + M)*R*v

> = (.03792)(.015)(.6798) = .0003866 kg*m2/s

This is also wrong. Help?
 
Hi TheOriginalTy! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
TheOriginalTy said:
for angular speed i used that w= v/r and had 0.6798(m/s) /.015 (m) = 45.32 (rad/s)

(what happened to that ω i gave you? :confused:)

no, ω = v/r only applies where one point is fixed, and another point a distance r away has speed v

in this case, v is the speed of the (new) centre of mass, and goodness-knows where the fixed point (the centre of rotation) is! :wink:

You need to find ω some other way. :smile:
I need to find … the angular momentum right after the collision.

Sorry, i don't understand the question …

the angular momentum about which point? :confused:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top