Classical mechanics - mass/spring attached to moving support

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a mass attached to a spring, with the support oscillating. The initial attempt at finding the motion of the mass relative to the support and the lab frame contained errors in integration and assumptions about acceleration. Corrections were made to the equations, emphasizing the need for a proper understanding of the mass's motion as influenced by both the spring and the oscillating support. The correct approach involves treating the positions of the mass and support as separate variables and formulating a second-order differential equation to derive the solution. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately accounting for all forces and motions in classical mechanics problems.
ihatelolcats
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass, m, is attached to a support by a spring with spring constant, k. The mass is hanging down from the spring, so there is a gravitational force on the mass as well. Neglect any resistive or frictional force. The support is then oscillated with an amplitude of A and at a frequency of ωa .
a) Find the motion of the mass relative to the support.
b) Find the motion of the mass relative to the lab (inertial frame).


Homework Equations



F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I found the motion of the mass relative to the support to be
x*=-kAcos(ωt)/(mt^2)-(gt^2)/2
by integrating twice
ma*=kAcos(ωt)-mg
which seems reasonable.

For part b, I said
x=x*+Acos(ωt)
so the motion of the mass relative to the lab
x=Acos(ωt)(1-k/(mt^2))-(gt^2)/2.
Is this valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You said that the support oscillates at a frequency of wa, (omega times a). What is a? Was it just a miss-type?

Also, for part a, I don't think you integrated cosine correctly. why does t^2 end up on the denominator of the integrated function?
 
You are correct, the frequency is just w. And it should be ω^2 instead of t^2 in the denominator.
So the answer to part b is changed to
x=Acos(ωt)(1-k/(mω^2))-(gt^2)/2.
 
Unfortunately, its not so simple. This equation: ma*=kAcos(ωt)-mg is wrong. It assumes that the only contribution to the relative acceleration is due to the support moving, but the mass will have motion also.

Sorry I didn't say this in my first post, but I had only looked through your work for obvious errors. Another reason to be suspicious of your answer is that as t gets larger, x approaches minus infinity! This is not a realistic solution, so it should hint to you that your assumptions were incorrect.

The true equation representing this situation is an inhomogeneous 2nd-order differential equation. To get the equation, just think about the position of the support and position of the mass as two separate variables (to begin with), and you know the equation for the force on the mass due to relative distance between mass and support. Then you can see the position of the mass as the dependent variable and the position of the support as simply the inhomogeneous part of the equation. From there you need to solve the complementary function and particular integral, which eventually gives you the solution.

There are probably short-cut ways of doing all this, but this is the standard way that is shown in most textbooks.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top