Music Discovering Classical Music: Suggestions Welcome!

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around recommendations for classical music, particularly for someone new to the genre. Key pieces mentioned include Mozart's Requiem, Beethoven's works (notably Fur Elise and the 9th Symphony), and Bach's compositions. Participants highlight favorites such as Tchaikovsky's symphonies, Orff's Carmina Burana, and Mahler's 5th Symphony, while also suggesting accessible pieces like Vivaldi's Four Seasons and Pachelbel's Canon. Various composers are discussed, with many agreeing on the significance of Beethoven and Bach in classical music. Recommendations for exploring different styles and eras, including 20th-century music, are encouraged. Additionally, resources like classical music websites and collections are suggested for beginners to discover their preferences. The conversation also touches on the emotional depth of classical music and the importance of personal interpretation when listening.
Dooga Blackrazor
Messages
258
Reaction score
0
I'm starting to listen to a bit of Classical Music. I'm unsure what's good so does anyone have any favorites or a site that lists great songs perhaps?

Right now I have four songs: The Requiem by Mozart, Fur Elise by Beethoven, Moonlight Sonata by Beethoven and Allegro Concerto #3 by Bach. My favorite is The Requiem if that helps determine my listening style any.

Thanks to anyone who helps me out.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Beethoven. Sym. #7 Allegretto.
 
Bach's 3rd Brandenburg Symphony
 
I believe Fur Elize was Beethoven?

Tchaichowsky is my favorite. I like his 4th, 5th, and 6th, Marche Slave, Capricci Italien and 1812 overture.

Beethoven's 9th is probably the one piece of music most often acclaimed as "the best" ever.

Orff's Carmina Buranna is very good.

Bizet's Carmen is the only Opera I like.

Lizst's Hungarian Rhapsody's are good.

I like Mahler's 5th symphony, but most people find it depressing.

Njorl
 
Fur Elise was Beethoven. Your correct, my mistake.
 
Try Schubert Trout Quintet, Beethoven Violin Concerto, Tchaikovski 4th 5th and 6th Symphonies, Rachmananov Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini.

Added. I currently have in my 5-CD player, the Partitas and Sonatas for unaccompanied violin, by J.S. Bach, and the late piano sonatas of Beethoven, played by Afred Brendel. These are old recordings remastered by Phillips. I have been digging into them and have recently been tempted to pay $139 for an online Music Theory class to understand them better and maybe move on to a Beethven Cello Sonata analysis course I also found online. Each of those is two discs. The 5th disc is a suite arranged from Prokofiev's music for the ballet Romeo & Juliet.
 
Last edited:
Nothing heavy for me.

I keep it light with Vivaldi's Four Seasons and Pachelbel's Canon in D Major.

More often, though, I pull out my Herman's Hermits stuff. :approve:
 
Last edited:
I don't know the Mozart Requiem, but I don't guess it is typical since most of his music is upbeat. I happen to have a collection of all his 21 piano concertos. I never listen to them.

For beginners, you almost can't go wrong with the Beethoven 5th Symphony. It is the ultimate heavy, dramatic piece of music.

Beethoven was considered the greatest symphonist, and I agree with that. The odd numbered ones are the best: 3, 5, 7, and 9. However 6 and 8 are also not to be missed. 1 and 2 are dissapointments by comparison.

Beethoven's piano concertos are also excellent. He only wrote five. The best are 3-5. (Again, 1 + 2 are not so hot by comparison.)

Pachelbel's Canon, I agree, is a great piece for beginners. It is extremely serene and pretty and accessible.

All of the Brandenberg Concertos by Bach are wonderful. Even more accessible, though, is Handel's Water Music - a suite of extremely pleasant, funny, energetic little pieces that gets your toes tapping and brings a smile.


-Zooby
 
New World Symphony by Dvorak. It's unbelieveablely good. We played it in marching band my senior year.
 
  • #10
Dvorak's 7th is pretty darned good too. Some of my other favorites that others haven't mentioned are, in no particular order:

Sorcerer's Apprentice, by Dukas
Bacchanale (from Sampson and Delilah), by Saint-Saens
A few of the Slavonic Dances, by Dvorak.
The Planets, by Holst
Symphony #5, by Shostakovich
Symphony #2, by Sibelius
Finlandia, by Sibelius
Symphony #8 (unfinished), by Schubert
Pictures at an Exhibition, by Mussorgsky
Night on Bald Mountain, by Mussorgsky
Romeo and Juliet, by Tchaikovsky

www.classicalarchives.com is a pretty good online source for classical music.
 
  • #11
Hurkyl said:
Dvorak's 7th is pretty darned good too. Some of my other favorites that others haven't mentioned are, in no particular order:

Sorcerer's Apprentice, by Dukas
Bacchanale (from Sampson and Delilah), by Saint-Saens
A few of the Slavonic Dances, by Dvorak.
The Planets, by Holst
Symphony #5, by Shostakovich
Symphony #2, by Sibelius
Finlandia, by Sibelius
Symphony #8 (unfinished), by Schubert
Pictures at an Exhibition, by Mussorgsky
Night on Bald Mountain, by Mussorgsky

I don't know about the rest of y'all but...I say it's time to start downloading.
 
  • #12
Chrono said:
New World Symphony by Dvorak. It's unbelieveablely good. We played it in marching band my senior year.
Hehehehe. Yeah, there's nothing like a transcription of a good symphony for marching band!
 
  • #13
zoobyshoe said:
Hehehehe. Yeah, there's nothing like a transcription of a good symphony for marching band!

Oh, hell yeah, man! I still have the sheet music. If I recall, it was the only year in my six that we've done classical.
 
  • #14
Njorl said:
Bizet's Carmen is the only Opera I like.Njorl
That was my mother's favorite opera, and so I also like it.

I love Wagner's "Ride of the Valkyries" as done by Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd in "Kill da Wabbit". :biggrin:

I have always liked Shubert's "Unfinished Symphony".
 
  • #15
Evo said:
I have always liked Shubert's "Unfinished Symphony".
I'm partial to P.D.Q. Bach's "Unbegun Symphony", as well. Consists of a third and fourth movement.
 
  • #16
Zooby! How could you not mention Rachmaninoff! He is our fellow April fool!

Dooga -Concerto #2 and symphony # 2 will be instantly recognizable to you. They have been popular as movie themes(Groundhog's Day) and even as the basis for some pop-music songs. Both are absolutely wonderful.
 
  • #17
Math Is Hard said:
Zooby! How could you not mention Rachmaninoff! He is our fellow April fool!
He betrayed us. Not one funny bagatelle.
 
  • #18
Au Contraire! I believe he ate bagatelles on a regular basis. Didn't he live on France for a while to escape communism?
I have heard he liked his bagatelles with raspberry jam, pickled herring, and swiss cheese. Not funny, mind you, but still amusing.
 
  • #19
I really like Albinoni's funky Adagio. :D
 
  • #20
And oops! sorry, that was Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini by Rachmaninoff that was used in Grounghog day.
When you first put it on it will sound scattered and panicky and angry, but it settles down into a romantic theme.
Rachmaninoff was manic-depressive so I guess that's why that appealed to him.
 
  • #21
Math Is Hard said:
Au Contraire! I believe he ate bagatelles on a regular basis. Didn't he live on France for a while to escape communism?
I have heard he liked his bagatelles with raspberry jam, pickled herring, and swiss cheese. Not funny, mind you, but still amusing.
It sounds quite delicious but I'm still not laughing. Could he not have included some jellyfish on his bagatelle?
 
  • #22
Adam said:
I really like Albinoni's funky Adagio. :D

I love that piece too, but it's like a dirge for a funeral. Good for when you're feeling the blues.
Speaking of the blues, Ravel had some blues and jazz elements going on way before that style of music evolved. Listen to his Pavanne sometime and you'll definitely hear it!
 
Last edited:
  • #23
zoobyshoe said:
It sounds quite delicious but I'm still not laughing. Could he not have included some jellyfish on his bagatelle?

Definitely not, I'm afraid. Jellyfish are known to interfere with manic-depression medication, so his doctor probably did not allow that in his diet :smile:
 
  • #24
Math Is Hard said:
Definitely not, I'm afraid. Jellyfish are known to interfere with manic-depression medication, so his doctor probably did not allow that in his diet :smile:
Hah! Beethoven was manic-depressive and he ate jellyfish all the time. After he wrote the Bagatelle Furry Lisa he wrote that one Jelly Jennie.
 
Last edited:
  • #25
Math Is Hard said:
I love that piece too, but it's like a dirge for a funeral. Good for when you're feeling the blues.
Speaking of the blues, Ravel had some blues and jazz elements going on way before that style of music evolved. Listen to his Pavanne sometime and you'll definitely hear it!

I like to listen to it when watching storms.
 
  • #26
I envy you, Adam. Australian storms must be magnificent. California storms are weak and puny. Maybe our actor/muscle-man governor will PUMP THEM UP! ha ha

Chopin is nice for rainy days, too.

oh, yeah, Zoobie - I forgot about the 9th symphony, Ode to Jellyfish.
 
  • #27
Ode to Jellyfish is funky.

Also Winter allegro from Vivaldi.
 
  • #28
Adam said:
Ode to Jellyfish is funky.
Ode an die Jellyfische

von Friedrich Jellyfischer

Jellyfishy! Jellyfishy!
Daughter of the briney deep.
Here we flounder,
Drunk and stupid,
Much like cattle,
or like sheep.

Then your magic
Binds together
What old customs
Parted wide.

All mankind
Is reunited
When upon
The waves you ride!
 
Last edited:
  • #29
I don't to listen to music anymore, but when I did, I was almost exclusively a classical music fan. Almost anything by Bach, Vivaldi, Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms and Mahler will satisfy. Don't restrict yourself to symphonies, though. Trios, quartets, sonatas, concertos, etc should be the targets of your exploration. And that's another thing: explore. Read a few books about classical music. Learn about the different styles. Then try out 20th century music. Or medieval music. Or renaissance music. There's a lot to learn and enjoy.
 
  • #30
I just got introduced to Berlioz' Symphonie Fantastique by a friend, and I think it's definitely a new favorite.

- Warren
 
  • #31
I would suggest buying a lot of cheap crap ;) Er, I mean, there are plenty of "greatest/favorites" collections, and big boxed sets that, though sometimes lacking in other areas, contain a great variety of music and artists. This is the best way to discover what *you* like, and it will help you appreciate the different performances, when you seek them out.

I would also warn against being unduly influenced by other's opinions- Chopin doesn't seem to make the cut around here- but he is one of my favorites. And I don't really enjoy Mozart- sometimes I find him downright annoying. Whatever floats your boat.

You may also want to watch the two Fantasia movies- they can get you to think about the music in different ways. And there are several movies about certain performers or featuring classical music (ex. Immortal Beloved, Red Violin). And watch live performances- PBS features them regularly- another person's passion or care can be inspiring.
Happy listening
Rachel
P.S. "Chopin: Nocturnes" performed by Ivan Moravec is one of my favorite CDs - you can find it on Amazon :)
 
  • #32
honestrosewater said:
I would suggest buying a lot of cheap crap ;) Er, I mean, there are plenty of "greatest/favorites" collections, and big boxed sets that, though sometimes lacking in other areas, contain a great variety of music and artists. This is the best way to discover what *you* like, and it will help you appreciate the different performances, when you seek them out.

Absolutely. This is how I found what I liked and what I didn't. I had nearly forgotten.

So, what orchestras do people like?

I like Philadelphia's under Ormandy. I here they were better under Stokowski, but the recording tech was not as good. I also was suprised at how good the Cleveland orchestra was under Szell. I had never heard of them when I bought my first CD. I must say, I've always been disappointed by Bernstein's orchestra, maybe I had expectations set too high. You have to be careful with "London" orchestras. There are about 30 of them, and I know I can't keep them straight.

Njorl
 
  • #33
zoobyshoe said:
I'm partial to P.D.Q. Bach's "Unbegun Symphony", as well. Consists of a third and fourth movement.

How about a game of "OPERA WHIZ!", or deuling divas!
:biggrin:

Njorl
 
  • #34
IMO:
Classical music is at its best with J.S. Bach.
J.S. Bach is at his best at the piano (Klavier).
No one ever played bach on the piano better than Glen Gould.

You will not be disappointed by getting "The Goldberg Variations" as performed by Mr. Gould. He recorded it twice, 1955 and 1981. A real snob will insist the first recording was more masterful, although I am fond of the latter. I understand it has recently been remastered so that Mr. Gould's annoying habit to "sing along" has been removed.

Also you could try "The Well-tempered Klavier, Book1"

Fun fact:
Remember in "the Silence of the Lambs," the scen where Hannibal is in the cage in the big room, listening to classical music (right before he takes a bite out of the policeman's face)? Hannibal is listening to the 1955 recording of the "Aria" from Goldberg Variations.
 
  • #35
Math Is Hard said:
Zooby! How could you not mention Rachmaninoff! He is our fellow April fool!

He has an amazing piece, I believe it is called Adagio. We played a bit of it in concert band before.
 
  • #36
Chi Meson said:
IMO:
Classical music is at its best with J.S. Bach.
Most people who appreciate and understand serious music would agree with this. He is more often ranked as the greatest composer who ever lived than any other composer.
However, huge amounts of Bach's music are not accessible to people who are switching over from a previous orientation in pop music. I think the Romantic composers are the best ones by which to make the transition.
J.S. Bach is at his best at the piano (Klavier).
Yes, provided you mention that he never actually wrote anything for the piano. It wasn't invented till he was an old man. He got to play one once and pronounced it seemed to have possibilities. The pieces by Bach that are commonly played on the piano nowadays were written for the harpsichord and clavichord. "Klavier" technically refers to any keyboard instrument, and technically includes the pipe organ, but a separation between the music he wrote for the "klavier" and the pipe organ is generally maintained. There is the issue of the pedal part, among other things.
No one ever played bach on the piano better than Glen Gould.
It might be better to say no one ever played Bach more brilliantly. He was a dazzling pianist. Critics and listeners alike sometimes took exception to some of his stranger interpretations.
You will not be disappointed by getting "The Goldberg Variations" as performed by Mr. Gould. He recorded it twice, 1955 and 1981. A real snob will insist the first recording was more masterful, although I am fond of the latter. I understand it has recently been remastered so that Mr. Gould's annoying habit to "sing along" has been removed.
I also like the second recording alot. The main trouble with it is that he was competing against no one but himself, and he had already blown everyone away with the first recording which was unbelievable. The 1955 Goldberg recording made Glen Gould, and it also made the Goldbergs what they are today. Before Glen Gould the Goldbergs were a part of harpsichord literature, and hence, relatively obscure. People certainly didn't play them as much as the Well Tempered Claver. Glen Gould made them part of piano literature.

I have exactly 20 different recordings of the Goldbergs. My favorite, after Glen Gould's, is by Charles Rosen. He takes all the repeats, in addition to giving an excellent performance, and I enjoy hearing them with the repeats.

I wouldn't reccomend them to anyone just starting out listening to serious music, though. They're too subtle. (Then there is that one slow, long, bleak, endless variation that brings everything to a halt for a while with it's cold, anxiety filled, winter.) I was quite bored with them the first time I heard them. Now, as you can probably tell, they are my favorite Bach. Maybe some other people will look into them on our reccomendation, but I wouldn't suggest them to Dooga.
Also you could try "The Well-tempered Klavier, Book1"
Overall, I actually like Book II better.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
What age did you guys all start to enjoy Classical Music? I'm curious. ;) An amazing turnout for the thread. I've got many songs to download yet. :)

So far my favorites are Mozart's Requiem and Beethoven's Symphony #6-5th Movement Allegreto. The name is long enough heh. But it could be the wrong name since downloading is weird that way.

Also, I have very low music knowledge. I get basic themes and messages from it. Like the Requiem delivers a powerful mood and such. I'm just wondering if there are other messages in the songs. Does each note symbolize a feeling for different composers or something. Are there any sites on this if that's the case?
 
Last edited:
  • #38
My mother played classical music for me when I was in the womb. I guess that's why I have always loved it. Also I started playing piano when I was very young, so a lot of my appreciation of classical comes from pieces I learned to play. I would never have cared much for Bach if I hadn't actually worked through some of the inventios. The technical difficulty of the pieces made them exciting.
Do you play any instruments, Dooga?
 
  • #39
Peer Gynt-Suite 1, Op 46 and Suite 2, Op 55 by Edvard Grieg
 
  • #40
Dooga Blackrazor said:
What age did you guys all start to enjoy Classical Music? I'm curious.
I was about 14 before I got into it.
Beethoven's Symphony #6-5th Movement Allegreto. The name is long enough heh. But it could be the wrong name since downloading is weird that way.
No, you got it right. Strange, though. You picked the 5th movement of one of the only symphonies by anyone that has more than 4 movements. 4 movements is pretty standard for symphonys.
I'm just wondering if there are other messages in the songs. Does each note symbolize a feeling for different composers or something. Are there any sites on this if that's the case?
In serious music everything isn't called a "song". Everything is called a "piece", short for "piece of music." This is because that term covers everything, whereas "song" really only applies to individual pieces where there is singing. The Mozart requiem, for instance, wouldn't becalled a "song" because it is more than just one isolated piece of singing. Shubert and Brahms wrote a lot of just plain songs. All the songs they wrote are still referred to as "pieces".

No, each note by itself has no meaning. It is only when they are put together in relation to other notes when you start to get signifigance.
 
  • #41
Brahms, Mendelsohn, Wagner
 
  • #42
Mendelsohn? Are you joking? He's a freakin hack. :P
 
  • #43
Math Is Hard said:
My mother played classical music for me when I was in the womb. I guess that's why I have always loved it. Also I started playing piano when I was very young, so a lot of my appreciation of classical comes from pieces I learned to play. I would never have cared much for Bach if I hadn't actually worked through some of the inventios. The technical difficulty of the pieces made them exciting.
Do you play any instruments, Dooga?

No instruments here. I might take up the piano someday. I found it was fairly easy to get the hang of when I played it in music class. I never bothered to take music this year or in the next two years. Unless your going into a musical career I feel it's more beneficial to take other subjects such as Physics. It just doesn't fit into my schedule. Perhaps if I need a hobby sometime I can look into it.
 
  • #44
Dooga Blackrazor said:
Unless your going into a musical career I feel it's more beneficial to take other subjects such as Physics. It just doesn't fit into my schedule. Perhaps if I need a hobby sometime I can look into it.
There is a whole physics to sound production in music that creates a great overlap between the two. I have lately been following this train of understanding, myself. Trying to grasp how musical instuments produce sound leads further and further into physics. Our own PF Administrator, Chroot, is a guitarist, and also quite adept at the physics of sound. The two disciplines support each other quite nicely.
 
  • #45
I like Mendelsohn's Violin Concerto (I also like Tschaikovsky and Brahm's).
 
  • #46
zoobyshoe said:
I have exactly 20 different recordings of the Goldbergs. My favorite, after Glen Gould's, is by Charles Rosen. He takes all the repeats, in addition to giving an excellent performance, and I enjoy hearing them with the repeats.

I wouldn't reccomend them to anyone just starting out listening to serious music, though. They're too subtle. (Then there is that one slow, long, bleak, endless variation that brings everything to a halt for a while with it's cold, anxiety filled, winter.) I was quite bored with them the first time I heard them. Now, as you can probably tell, they are my favorite Bach. Maybe some other people will look into them on our reccomendation, but I wouldn't suggest them to Dooga.

I agree with your asessment of the "middle" part of Goldberg; I often hit the skip button if I'm feeling impatient. But I think that anyone can be quickly pulled in by the Aria and the first 10 variations. The segue from Aria to variation 1 is without a doubt one of my favorite moments in Classical music.
 
  • #47
Dooga Blackrazor said:
What age did you guys all start to enjoy Classical Music? I'm curious. ;) An amazing turnout for the thread. I've got many songs to download yet. :)
...
Also, I have very low music knowledge. I get basic themes and messages from it. Like the Requiem delivers a powerful mood and such. I'm just wondering if there are other messages in the songs. Does each note symbolize a feeling for different composers or something. Are there any sites on this if that's the case?

I started classical piano training at the age of FIVE. Stopped abruptly at high school and went straight to punk rock (imagine the shocked parents). I have now grown tolerant of all forms of music (except for "big hair" bands of the 80s, but they have all gone away now, and are but like a faint memory of a bad toothache).


Oh, and never let anyone tell you what mood you have to feel when listening to music. That's how you tell if it works for you.

THere are some "rules" to follow while listening (break 'em as you wish, of course): you never-ever "get it" on the first listen. IF you do, then you really didn't, or else the music is too simple. So give each piece three full-attention sittings. IF you listen to a sonata or concerto or symphony, listen to all the parts ("movements") in their proper order. Don't force your friends to "come in here and listen to this, it's amazing!" It never works.
 
Last edited:
  • #48
Chrono said:
I don't know about the rest of y'all but...I say it's time to start downloading.

what is this 'downloading' you speak of? ... :wink: :smile:
 
  • #49
I can play Beethoven's "Fur Elise" on my mandolin. :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #50
How do you reach the keys while sitting on your mandolin?
 

Similar threads

5
Replies
205
Views
10K
Replies
322
Views
27K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
51
Views
18K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Back
Top