Classification of figure from the general equation of conics

sadhu
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
during my study on conics , I found a formula in the book regarding the classification of figure from the general equation of conics

ax2+2hxy+by2+2gx+2fy+c=0

it was given that
\Delta=abc+2fgh-af^{2}-{bg}^{2}-{ch}^{2}

if \Delta \neq 0
then if
h^{2}=ab...parabola
h^{2}<ab...ellipse
h^{2}>ab...hyperbola

if
\Delta <0...circle ,h=0,a=b\neq 0,g^{2}+f^{2}-ac>0

if
\Delta = 0
if
h^{2}>=ab...line
h^{2}<ab...unique point



No explanation regarding the derivation of result was given
neither i could find it on net

hope someone knows it...

thanks in advance
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A full analysis and explanation would require a long document so I'll give an online resource at projecteuclid.org which investigates by elementary algebra the values of ##y## as ##x## increases from ##-\infty## to ##+\infty## and the values of ##x## as ##y## increases from ##-\infty## to ##+\infty## and classifies the loci by their principal graphical properties so found.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top