Cleaning chromatography columns and hydrodynamics

AI Thread Summary
When determining the worst-case scenario for cleaning chromatography columns, factors such as column shape and size significantly influence fluid dynamics. Tall, skinny columns may allow better fluid distribution due to less resistance at the sides, while short, fat columns could lead to contaminant accumulation at the edges where flow is slower. Darcy's Law provides insight into how flow rates are affected by column dimensions, with longer columns potentially increasing pressure and improving flow to less accessible areas. Understanding the behavior of fluid in these columns is crucial for ensuring effective cleaning, especially at the top and bottom corners. Overall, selecting the right column dimensions for testing cleaning efficacy is essential for optimizing the cleaning process.
VectorJam
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If you had to prove that your method for cleaning chromatography columns works and you had different sizes and shapes of columns, which one would you pick as a worst case to focus on? You have tall, skinny columns and short, fat columns, as well as different sizes. These are cylindrical glass columns that range from a diameter of 1.6 cm to 5 cm and a length of 10 cm to 100 cm. Assume they all contain the same chromatography media and are all rinsed with the same linear flow rate. Assume that they all have the same basic design and are composed of the same materials. These would be cleaned by running a small volume of sodium hydroxide throught the column (same percent of total column volume for each column) and then rinsed with a salt solution (buffer). Important considerations are that the sodium hydroxide contacts all portions of the media for a minimum length of time and rinsing sufficiently removes all of the sodium hydroxide. I ask because I'm not sure of what sort of fluid dynamics are going on within the column and whether column shape or size might affect how well the solutions are able to reach all areas of the column.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you Andy. Darcy's Law seems to explain that the total discharge (flow rate) is proportional to the permeability, cross-sectional area, viscosity and pressure drop, and inversely proportional to the length of the column, which all makes sense to me. But I guess I'm looking for some law of physics (or such) that might explain why fluid traveling through a long, narrow column might behave differently than fluid through a short, wide column, for example. If one particular set of dimensions would be more likely to result in regions of the media being exposed to lower flow rates than other regions (maybe at the edges where the top and bottom caps contact the sides), then that would be the set of dimensions I would prove my cleaning process against since it would be the worst case.
 
Hmmm. I think the fluid would flow faster down the middle of the column due to the resistance at the sides. (Duh!) And therefore, wouldn't a short fat column be more likely to allow accumulation of contaminants at the top and bottom edges where the caps contact the cylinder - since the flow would be quite low here. On a longer, narrower column, wouldn't the increase in pressure due to the length cause more fluid to flow into this area?
 
VectorJam said:
Thank you Andy. Darcy's Law seems to explain that the total discharge (flow rate) is proportional to the permeability, cross-sectional area, viscosity and pressure drop, and inversely proportional to the length of the column, which all makes sense to me. But I guess I'm looking for some law of physics (or such) that might explain why fluid traveling through a long, narrow column might behave differently than fluid through a short, wide column, for example. If one particular set of dimensions would be more likely to result in regions of the media being exposed to lower flow rates than other regions (maybe at the edges where the top and bottom caps contact the sides), then that would be the set of dimensions I would prove my cleaning process against since it would be the worst case.

My understanding is that the columns are tightly packed with beads (or something like that); Darcy's law can be viewed as Poiseuille flow when friction effects dominate- somthing like air resistance. It's similar to Brinkman's equation: the NS equation with a friction term added. The fluid flow is nearly uniform everywhere for this situation.

If you are more concerned with the specifics at the top and bottom corners, then you need to be a lot more careful.

There's online packed column calculators that you may find useful:

http://www.chemsof.com/column/column.htm
http://www.katmarsoftware.com/pcol.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top