Clockwise or counterclockwise rotation about a fulcrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter invadertak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fulcrum Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a uniform plank balanced on two supports, with a person walking on the overhanging section. The key equations used include the sum of forces and torques, with the upward forces from the supports and the weights of the plank and person balanced. The confusion arises regarding the direction of torque, specifically whether the torque produced by the left support should be considered negative when calculating the tipping point at the right support. Clarification is sought on the convention of clockwise versus counterclockwise rotation in relation to the fulcrum. Understanding these torque conventions is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
invadertak
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The diagram shows a uniform plank of length 5m and weight 225N that rests horizontally on two supports, with 1.1 m hanging over the right support. To what distance x can a person who weighs 450 N walk on the overhanging part of the plank before it just begins to tip?

l-x-l

\0/
l
/\
_________________
^ ^
l-1.1m-l

Homework Equations


T=Fl
\Sigma T = 0
\Sigma F = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Take upward direction as positive and clockwise direction of motion as positive
Name the leftmost fulcrum L and the right fulcrum R
Fy = FL + FR - FWplank - FWPerson
Fy = 0
Thus FL + FR - 225N - 450 N = 0
Thus FL = 675N - + FR

This is where I get stuck. My equation kept boiling down to rubbish and when I checked the web for a solution, I found out I need to make the torque produced by Force L a negative number with respect to fulcrum R. However, won't the upward force of L produce a clockwise rotation? The rotation at R caused by force L is the only place that I seem to be messing up as other equations are exactly as the memo indicated. But I have taken clockwise to be positive (as the memo also indicated) and yet the memo says that my torque at L is negative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry-one correction- FL=675N - FR
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top