Closed loop Servomechanism problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ATRIX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Loop
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a closed loop feedback system involving a turbine blade's inertia and viscous damping. The user is tasked with proving a specific equation related to the system's dynamics, expressed in D notation. They are attempting to reverse engineer the system's definition but are struggling to connect the original boundary conditions to the desired quadratic form. Additionally, there is a potential error in the question regarding the accelerometer's representation. The user seeks advice and clarification on their approach to solving the problem.
ATRIX
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]

Hey Guys

Firstly thanks for looking, I really appreciate any help or interest with my problem.

The problem is a closed loop feedback system it's unlike any I have come across before.

I have been given the definition which is as follows:-

G(t)^-1 = 2.5 x 10 ^-3 {(1-400k)}D^2+10D+400

i have to prove it with the following information.

I = Inertia of the turbine blade is = 1kg/m
c.ω= viscous Damped rotation (hysteresis) = 10 rad/s Nm
T = Torque motor= 400[e + k d^2θ/dt^2] Nm
e=(θin-θout) = angular position error in rads between the input and output shaft
k.d^2θout/dt^2= defines the additional feedback signal, accelerometer i am guessing

The definition or the answer that we are trying to work it into is in D notation, or operator D. this is where we can replace the derivatives of angular acceleration or position with D
there fore
D = dθ/dt
D^2 = d^2θ/dt^2



Homework Equations



general format of second order system

θout/θin = k/(1/ωn^2)D^2+(2ζ/ωn)D+1

this is a general solution

Zeta is a damping coeff of the system

Newton's 2nd law

∑T=∑I.α

The Attempt at a Solution



As for the work i have carried out, is that i am trying to reverse engineer the definition of the system to get the numbers, i can see that the answer is quadratic, D^2 and D and 400. but can not seem to get from the original boundary conditions to there. i have also tried to split the loops up into two. this did not work for me.

using basic control algebra i have deduced that the accelerometor should e k. d^2θ/dt^2 not
k.d^2θout/dt^2 this i believe is a mistake on my question paper.

thanks for looking. any advice would be welcomed.

Atrix
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
sorry I did not mention that there is as uploaded visual representation to help understanding, many thanks
Alex
 
Back
Top