CM Momentum Equations: My Notes Reveal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chronos000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Chronos000
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
my notes tell me the following, speaking about a two body collision with one particle initially stationary. However i have no clue where lines 7.23 and 7.24 come from. (big "V" is CM velocity, v* is velocity of particle relative to the CM)

Taking a Galilean transformation to the lab frame, before the collision we get:
p1= m1 v1 = m1(v∗1 + V) = p∗ + m1 V
p2= m2 v2 = m2(v∗2 + V) = −p∗ + m2 V
while after the collision we get:
q1= q∗ + m1 V (7.21)
q2= −q∗ + m2 V. (7.22)
Exploiting the fact that p2= 0 we find


p1= p∗(1 + m1/m2) (7.23)
q1= q∗ + p∗m1/m2 (7.24)
q2= p∗ − q∗. (7.25)

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chronos000 said:
my notes tell me the following, speaking about a two body collision with one particle initially stationary. However i have no clue where lines 7.23 and 7.24 come from. (big "V" is CM velocity, v* is velocity of particle relative to the CM)

Taking a Galilean transformation to the lab frame, before the collision we get:
p1= m1 v1 = m1(v∗1 + V) = p∗ + m1 V
p2= m2 v2 = m2(v∗2 + V) = −p∗ + m2 V
while after the collision we get:
q1= q∗ + m1 V (7.21)
q2= −q∗ + m2 V. (7.22)
Exploiting the fact that p2= 0 we find

p1= p∗(1 + m1/m2) (7.23)
q1= q∗ + p∗m1/m2 (7.24)
q2= p∗ − q∗. (7.25)
If p2 = 0, p* = m2V. Substitute that value for p* in the first equation and you get

p1 = m2V + m1V = m2V(1 + m1/m2) = p*(1+m1/m2)

Do the same substitution in 7.22 to get 7.25. To get 7.24, let m1V =(m2V)(m1/m2) = p*(m1/m2)

AM
 
thanks for your help, that makes perfect sense
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top