Coefficient of kinetic friction on 2 different parts

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a mass sliding down an incline and then traveling horizontally. The initial speed is given as 2.17 m/s, and the mass travels specific distances on both the incline and horizontal sections before stopping. The participants emphasize the need to apply energy conservation principles, considering both potential and kinetic energy changes, along with work done against friction. They clarify that the mass retains some velocity at the end of the incline, which is crucial for determining the friction coefficient. The conversation highlights the importance of setting up equations that relate kinetic energy to work done by friction to solve for the unknowns.
yannguyen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When the mass M is at the position shown, it has a speed v0 = 2.17 m/s and is sliding down the inclined part of a slide. The mass reaches the bottom of the incline and then travels a distance S2 = 2.45 m along the horizontal part of the slide before stopping. The distance S1 = 1.11 m and the angle of the incline is θ = 31.1o. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction for the mass on the surface.

PhysicsGraph.jpg



Homework Equations


E= KE + U

E+ W (ext) = 0 -> E = -W (ext) (which is the work done by frictional force)


The Attempt at a Solution


So far I've analysed the x and y components of the mass on path S1 and path S2. This is what I've got

Path S1:
y-dir: N = mgcosθ
x-dir: ƩF = -F(friction) + mgsinθ = -μmgcosθ + mgsinθ

So W1 ( work done on S1) = S1(-μmgcosθ + mgsinθ)

Path S2:
W2 = -μmg(S2)

Since -W (total) = E
W1+W2 = KE + U (at original position)
S1(-μmgcosθ + mgsinθ) - μmg(S2) = - [(1/2)mv2 + mgS1sinθ]

μ(S1gcosθ + gS2) = 2S1gsinθ + v2/2

μ = (2S1gsinθ + v2/2)/(S1gcosθ + gS2)

So far I've got μ = .105 but it's wrong!

I'd really appreciate if anyone helped me out with this cos I totally have no idea how to figure out the right answer!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can begin with part 2 and write an equation that relates the velocity at the bottom of the hill to the distance covered until it stops on the horizontal. To do this, relate the KE (including unknown V at bottom of part 1) to the work done overcoming friction. That gives you an equation with two unknowns, V and mu. There are no potential energy changes when moving horizontally.

Look at part 1 and write your energy balances. This will give you another equation with two unknowns, again being V and mu. This time you have to consider potential and kinetic energy changes as well as work. Eliminate V and solve for mu.
 
I'm not sure if i got u right. Does that mean that on part 1 that i have the potential energy change and the change in the KE too? (the velocity at the end of S1 is not 0?) and then on part 2 I just have the change in kinetic energy, which also equals to the work done by frictional force on S2?
 
LawrenceC said:
You can begin with part 2 and write an equation that relates the velocity at the bottom of the hill to the distance covered until it stops on the horizontal. To do this, relate the KE (including unknown V at bottom of part 1) to the work done overcoming friction. That gives you an equation with two unknowns, V and mu. There are no potential energy changes when moving horizontally.

Look at part 1 and write your energy balances. This will give you another equation with two unknowns, again being V and mu. This time you have to consider potential and kinetic energy changes as well as work. Eliminate V and solve for mu.

I'm not sure if i got u right. Does that mean that on part 1 that i have the potential energy change and the change in the KE too? (the velocity at the end of S1 is not 0?) and then on part 2 I just have the change in kinetic energy, which also equals to the work done by frictional force on S2?
 
Does that mean that on part 1 that i have the potential energy change and the change in the KE too? (the velocity at the end of S1 is not 0?)

Correct. The mass has an initial velocity and it will also have a final velocity that is different and unknown but it is the initial velocity for part 2. The initial velocity at the start of part 1 is given.

On part 2 the kinetic energy change is what it was at the end of part 1 and zero and it equals the work done against friction.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top