Coherence of Planar Wavefronts - Spatial & Temporal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Navid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coherence Waves
AI Thread Summary
Planar wavefronts are defined as spatially coherent, but their temporal coherence is not guaranteed. The discussion highlights that while a planar wavefront can maintain spatial coherence, it does not inherently require temporal coherence. The wave function E(r) = E0exp(±ik·r) is identified as a wave function rather than a wave equation, indicating a lack of time dependence. The relationship between spatial and temporal coherence in planar wavefronts remains a key point of inquiry. Ultimately, planar wavefronts can exist without being equidistant in time, suggesting that temporal coherence is not a necessity.
Navid
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Planar wave coherence
Relevant Equations
Plane wave equation: E(r) = E0exp(±ik·r)
Hi, are planar wavefronts both spatially and temporally coherent? Or, they are only spatially coherent and need not be temopral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Navid, :welcome: !

E(r) = E0exp(±ik·r) is more a wave function than a wave equation (that would look like ##u_{xx}=u_{tt}##). As you can see, your function does not satisfy the wave equation.

You first have to say something about the time dependence...
 
The main thing I want to get clear is a planar wavefront by definition should be spatially coherent. But, do they need to be equidistant in space as well, meaning do they, by definition, need to be temporally coherent?
 
##\exp\bigl (ik(t)\cdot r\bigr)## is still planar but not necessarily temporally coherent. But now I've said something about the time dependence.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top