Collision of the Halley asteroid with a comet

ahbouk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement


a comet gets in the way of the Halley asteroid, so the question is: what's the new trajectory of the asteroid (its excentricity, its orbital rotation and it perihelion, aphelion)

both objects have same mass and we suppose that the comet have an negilgeable initial velocity.

all variables and given/known data


what we know is :both objects have same mass M=2.2*10^14 kg

the coefficient of restitution during collision is: 0.5

orbital period of Halley's asteroid: T=75.3 years
initial perihelion: 0.586 AU

initial excentricity: 0.967

Homework Equations



the kepler third law

conservation of angular momentum
relation between energy and excentricity equation and trajectory of asteroid are attached

The Attempt at a Solution



my attempts are to use the conservation of energy and angular momentum but i didn't know how to get the parameters of the trajectory from.
 

Attachments

  • Sans titre.png
    Sans titre.png
    9.4 KB · Views: 537
Physics news on Phys.org
The object is called Halley's comet, and it is a comet, not an asteroid. Well, does not matter for the problem.

Is there a sketch provided? Where does the collision occur? The answer will depend on that.

Kinetic energy is not conserved in the collision.
 
reply

yes my fault it is Halley's comet and the asteroid is in the way of Halley's comet is explained by the joint image.
thnx
 

Attachments

  • jj.png
    jj.png
    27.1 KB · Views: 527
The given angle looks like the collision is supposed to be elastic - very unrealistic.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top