Combining Equations for Solving Complex Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter aboojoo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To combine the equations v2 = v1 + aΔt and Δd = v1Δt + 1/2aΔt², the goal is to eliminate a variable, typically Δt. Start by solving for Δt in the first equation, resulting in Δt = (v2 - v1)/a, and substitute this into the second equation. This substitution leads to a new expression for Δd, which can then be simplified. The original text's method of squaring both sides of the first equation is a different approach that may seem unfamiliar but is valid. Understanding various methods for combining equations enhances problem-solving skills in algebra.
aboojoo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Unsure of how to start the algebraic process of combining these two equations:


v2=v1+aΔt and Δd=v1Δt+1/2aΔt2 ,


The attached is a screenshot of the course material that I need help with. It demonstrates how to combine the two equations but it seems to skip some steps that I can't quite catch. I gathered to do so I should substitute one equation into the other, but do not know where to start. Some guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
 

Attachments

  • combine.png
    combine.png
    18.4 KB · Views: 831
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it helps to know first the goal for combining two, and that is to eliminate a variable. You could eliminate any of the variables in either equation, but in the picture you posted they eliminate Δt, so that's where you would start to combine them. One way would be to solve for Δt in one equation and then substitute into the other. That's essentially what they did, except by manipulating the left side to then substitute in something else.
 
Could you show me the exact algebraic steps involved?
Not sure where the 2a(v1Δt) comes from.
 
Last edited:
Well, if you solve for \Delta t in the first equation, you get: $$\Delta t = \frac{v_{2} - v_{1}}{a}$$
Substituting into the second equation yields: $$\Delta d = v_{1} \cdot \frac{v_{2} - v_{1}}{a} + \frac{1}{2}a \cdot (\frac{v_{2} - v_{1}}{a})^{2}$$

See if you can simplify from there.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I think I understand now, but am still puzzled by how the original text managed to get to the answer by simply squaring both sides of v2=v1+aΔt. It is a method I'm unfamiliar with since I do not know those steps.

I attached a picture for the rest of the steps that were to be done after yours. Thanks a lot for your help!*Edit, Spelling
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 510
Last edited:
No problem -- glad you were able to work it all out. Don't be discouraged about how the text got the answer. Combining equations is somewhat of an art form. The simplest way is usually to do a substitution like I showed you, but there are other ways like those the text used that involve cleverly cancelling certain things out to get the answer in fewer steps. For anyone to see immediately how to combine two equations as they did would be quite astounding.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top