Combining Resistors for 5W Dissipation in 10 Ohms

  • Thread starter Thread starter miew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
To achieve a 10-ohm resistor capable of dissipating at least 5 watts using 10 resistors rated at 1 watt each, a combination of series and parallel configurations is necessary. Initially, confusion arose regarding how multiple resistors could maintain the desired resistance while increasing power dissipation. The solution involves connecting resistors in parallel to lower the overall resistance and then combining those pairs in series to meet the power requirement. Ultimately, the minimum number of resistors needed is five, which allows for a total power dissipation of 5 watts. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding both resistance and power calculations in resistor configurations.
miew
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given a number of 10 resistors, each capable of dissipating only 1.0 W without being
destroyed. What is the minimum number of such resistors that you need to combine in series or
in parallel to make a 10 resistor that is capable of dissipating at least 5.0 W?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand the problem. I can't see how the final resistance can be 10 if there is more than one resistor. But at the same time I don't get how the power can be 5 with just one..

Help please, we haven't really seen this in class.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with 4 resistors. What is the resultant resistance of two parallel resistors each of resistance R? And what happens if you connect two such pairs in series?

ehild
 
OKay, so i got the resistance (I was doing wrong calculations) but I don;t get the power to be 5 but 4 W...
 
Try connecting more resistors. You need 5 at least.ehild
 
I got it now ! thank you :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top