Commutative free particle time evolution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to the time evolution of a free particle in quantum mechanics. Participants express confusion about starting the first part of the question and the concept of variance in this context. They clarify that variance in quantum mechanics can be related to statistical definitions, leading to the need to understand how to calculate expected values like <x(t)> and <x(t)^2>. One user attempts to derive the time evolution equation but struggles with the integration process. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges of applying statistical concepts to quantum mechanics and the need for clear guidance on solving the problem.
chaotic
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/2532/70224197.png

Homework Equations



i know schrödingher eq. and basic quantum formula

The Attempt at a Solution



i showed that the equality at the first question but i can not start from (a) part. how and where am i supposed to start for (a) part of question?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
i even don't know what is the time evoluation of varience? what is that?
 
Forget quantum mechanics for a second. From basic statistics, if x is a random variable, its variance is ##\sigma^2 = E[(x-\bar{x})^2]##, where ##\bar{x}=E(x)##. Now how does this translate into quantum mechanics? It should be clear how the first part of the problem then applies to solving (a).
 
thank you for your answer. now i am trying that

\frac{dψ}{dt} = \frac{iħ}{2m} d2ψ/dx2

after that i find that; (i send dt to right side)

ψ = ∫ \frac{iħ}{2m} d2ψ/dx2 dt

but i don't know how can i take the integral of right side?

after that i will use the <x> = ∫ψ* x ψ

is that true?
 
I have no idea what you're doing.
 
me too. I am very confused. can you just tell me how can i find <x(t)> and <x(t)^2>
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top