Commutator [A^n,B] = ? | Prove [AnB] = nAn-1[A,B] for n | Integrer | [A,B]=AB-BA

  • Thread starter Thread starter helpcometk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the commutator identity [A^n, B] = nA^(n-1)[A, B] for integer n, given the conditions [A, [A, B]] = 0 and [B, [A, B]] = 0. Participants emphasize the use of mathematical induction as a method for the proof, suggesting to start with the base case of n=2. The commutator definition [A, B] = AB - BA is crucial for manipulating the expressions involved in the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutators in linear algebra, specifically [A, B] = AB - BA.
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction principles.
  • Basic knowledge of operator theory and the properties of operators.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving exponents.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth.
  • Learn about the properties of commutators in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore operator differentiation and its implications in operator theory.
  • Investigate examples of commutator identities in linear algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, physicists, and anyone studying operator algebra and commutators in quantum mechanics or linear algebra.

helpcometk
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that [AnB] =nAn-1[A,B] for integrer n , assume [A,[A,B]]=0=[B,[A,B]]

Homework Equations


[A,B]=AB-BA


The Attempt at a Solution


Does anyone know how i should go to manipulate the exponent n ? I have tried to search but found nothing about a commutator like this properties.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the Principle of Mathematic induction and the commutator rule:
<br /> \left[ A \, C, B \right] = A \, \left[ C, B \right] + \left[A, B \right] \, C<br />
 
you can play as long as you ant with this formula ,but you will never be able to get what is asked except if you differentiate somehow ,becsuse you need have one n ,that is not exponent of A or B
 
You will also need to prove as an intermediate step that:
<br /> \left(\forall n \in \mathbb{N} \right) \left[ A^{n}, \left[ A, B \right] \right] = 0<br />
For this, use the principle of mathematical induction again and what you are given in the problem.
 
helpcometk said:
you can play as long as you ant with this formula ,but you will never be able to get what is asked except if you differentiate somehow ,becsuse you need have one n ,that is not exponent of A or B

By this logic, the only way to get 3x^2 from x^3 is to differentiate. Does that really seem like a reasonable thing to claim? (What happens if you multiply x^3 by \frac{3}{x}, for example?

Instead of differentiating your commutator somehow (Have you even defined how to differentiate an operator? Are your operators differentiable?), I suggest you follow DickFore's advice and use a proof by induction. I'd start by looking at a fairly simple case like n=2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K