Commutator of complex Klein-Gordon solution with total momentum

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys,

So I have to show the following:

[P^{\mu} , \phi(x)]=-i\partial^{\mu}\phi(x),

where

\phi(x)=\int \frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}2\omega(\vec{k})} \left[ a(\vec{k})e^{-ik\cdot x}+b^{\dagger}(\vec{k})e^{ik\cdot x} \right]

and

P^{\mu}=\int \frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}2\omega(\vec{k})} k^{\mu} \left[ \mathcal{N}_{a}(\vec{k})+\mathcal{N}_{b}(\vec{k}) \right]

Homework Equations



\mathcal{N}_{a}=a^{\dagger}(\vec{k})a(\vec{k})
\mathcal{N}_{b}=b^{\dagger}(\vec{k})b(\vec{k})

The Attempt at a Solution



So all I've done is calculated the commutator as normal and collected all the terms, and I've got:

JGYzoM.png

The only difference is that I've dropped the functional dependence on k to make it shorter.

I'm stuck at this point - not quite sure how to proceed! please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. Since P^\mu and \phi(x) both involve integrals, the product should be a double integral. And you need to distinguish between the integration for P^\mu and the integration for \phi(x). So use k for the first integral and k' for the second.

You need the commutation relation on the operators a^\dagger, a, b^\dagger, b. There are different conventions, so you have to look up which one your textbook is using, but it's something like this:

[ a^\dagger(k), a(k') ] = -(2 \pi)^3 2E \delta^3(k - k')

where E = k^0
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top