Comparing Coefficients of Thermal Expansion in Solid Rods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the lengths of an aluminum rod and a copper rod at 0 degrees Celsius, given their coefficients of thermal expansion. The aluminum rod has a higher expansivity than the copper rod, leading to the conclusion that it must have a shorter initial length to maintain the same change in length at varying temperatures. The correct lengths were determined to be 6 cm for aluminum and 8 cm for copper, which aligns with the teacher's feedback. Participants emphasized the relationship between expansivity and initial length, clarifying the reasoning behind the solution. The conversation concludes with a request for proofreading the coefficients of expansion.
Avaron Cooper
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the difference in length between an aluminium rod and a copper rof at 0 degreeC is 2cm. If they have the same difference in length at any temperature difference, what are the length of the 2 rods at 0 degreeC.?
Al - expansivity = 20*10^-4 K^-1
Cu- expansivity= 15*10^-6 K^-1

Homework Equations


alpha inversely proportional to the initial length

The Attempt at a Solution


i divided the expansivities of the two rods and made it equal to the ratio of theinitial lengths of the rods and got the length of the Al rod as 6 cm and the Cu rod as 8 cm. Which is the answer the school teacher said is correct. I can't understand why it can't be the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avaron Cooper said:
I can't understand why it can't be the other way around.
Think of it like this, if these two rods should have the same difference in lengths then the change in length has to be same, and hence you get
Avaron Cooper said:
alpha inversely proportional to the initial length
Now which material has the higher alpha? knowing that you can judge which should be shorter and which should be longer.
If not why don't you provide your calculations, it'll be easier to explain it to you or rather you'll figure it out yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes Avaron Cooper
Suraj M said:
Think of it like this, if these two rods should have the same difference in lengths then the change in length has to be same, and hence you get

Now which material has the higher alpha? knowing that you can judge which should be shorter and which should be longer.
If not why don't you provide your calculations, it'll be easier to explain it to you or rather you'll figure it out yourself.
okay.. Now I understand. Since Al has the higher alpha it should have the lower initial length. Thank you very much!
 
Please proofread correct your expansivities (or as we yanks say, coefficients of expansion).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top