Comparing Coefficients of Thermal Expansion in Solid Rods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the lengths of an aluminum rod and a copper rod at 0 degrees Celsius, given their coefficients of thermal expansion. The aluminum rod has a higher expansivity than the copper rod, leading to the conclusion that it must have a shorter initial length to maintain the same change in length at varying temperatures. The correct lengths were determined to be 6 cm for aluminum and 8 cm for copper, which aligns with the teacher's feedback. Participants emphasized the relationship between expansivity and initial length, clarifying the reasoning behind the solution. The conversation concludes with a request for proofreading the coefficients of expansion.
Avaron Cooper
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the difference in length between an aluminium rod and a copper rof at 0 degreeC is 2cm. If they have the same difference in length at any temperature difference, what are the length of the 2 rods at 0 degreeC.?
Al - expansivity = 20*10^-4 K^-1
Cu- expansivity= 15*10^-6 K^-1

Homework Equations


alpha inversely proportional to the initial length

The Attempt at a Solution


i divided the expansivities of the two rods and made it equal to the ratio of theinitial lengths of the rods and got the length of the Al rod as 6 cm and the Cu rod as 8 cm. Which is the answer the school teacher said is correct. I can't understand why it can't be the other way around.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Avaron Cooper said:
I can't understand why it can't be the other way around.
Think of it like this, if these two rods should have the same difference in lengths then the change in length has to be same, and hence you get
Avaron Cooper said:
alpha inversely proportional to the initial length
Now which material has the higher alpha? knowing that you can judge which should be shorter and which should be longer.
If not why don't you provide your calculations, it'll be easier to explain it to you or rather you'll figure it out yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes Avaron Cooper
Suraj M said:
Think of it like this, if these two rods should have the same difference in lengths then the change in length has to be same, and hence you get

Now which material has the higher alpha? knowing that you can judge which should be shorter and which should be longer.
If not why don't you provide your calculations, it'll be easier to explain it to you or rather you'll figure it out yourself.
okay.. Now I understand. Since Al has the higher alpha it should have the lower initial length. Thank you very much!
 
Please proofread correct your expansivities (or as we yanks say, coefficients of expansion).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top