Comparing Group theory and Electromagnetism

Futurestar33
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Good afternoon,

How can you mathematicaly talk about how how group theory compares to electromagnetism.

Homework Equations


e^iθ=Cosθ+iSinθ

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the above formula is because of a sin wave and a cosine wave. Put them together and you get a certain pattern. That corresponds to group theory but I really don't know too much else about it.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am sorry, but your entire question seems quite badly defined. Group theory is an important tool when dealing with electromagnetism or other physical theories, but it is unclear how you think they would be "compared" - one is a mathematical construct and tool while the other is a physics model.
 
Well our teacher asked us the question, I can post some more details a little later.

Also you said that Group theory is an important tool when dealing with electromagnetism, why?
 
Futurestar33 said:
Also you said that Group theory is an important tool when dealing with electromagnetism, why?

Group theory is an important tool in most of theoretical physics of today. For electromagnetism, it is a gauge theory based on the symmetry group U(1). This probably does not mean much to you at present, but will be fundamental if you go on to study more advanced physics.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top