Comparing Kinetic and Potential Energy in Falling Objects

AI Thread Summary
In a vacuum, a rocket moving at constant speed requires no external force to maintain its motion, confirming Newton's first law. When analyzing a falling ball, potential energy (PE) decreases while kinetic energy (KE) increases as it descends. Just before impact, the final KE is less than the initial PE due to energy loss from air resistance. The relationship can be expressed as PE = KE + work done against air resistance. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the principles of energy conservation and the effects of external forces on moving objects.
future_vet
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket moves through empty space in a straight line with constant speed. It is far from the gravitational effect of any star or planet. Under these conditions, the force that must be applied to the rocket in order to sustain its motion is ?

The Attempt at a Solution


I would say zero, since in the absence of an external force, a moving object will move with constant velocity...

A ball falls from the top of a building, through the air (air resistance is present), to the
ground below. How does the kinetic energy (KE) just before striking the ground
compare to the potential energy (PE) at the top of the building?
A) KE is equal to PE.
B) KE is greater than PE.
C) KE is less than PE.
D) It is impossible to tell.

The ball is falling, the potential energy decreases and the kinetic energy increases. When the ball hits the ground, I would say that KE is equal to PE. Would this be correct?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The final kinetic energy is actually less than than the initial PE because of the energy loss to air resistance. PE=KE+Wf
 
Thanks! Is the first one correct?
 
yes, Newton's first law.
 
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top